Need to decide today.

[thadanim]

Hi Guys.

After pondering for a long time and loads of confusion. Come down to a choice of stones, wondering which one of these best is the best one to get. All stones are eye clean. My main criteria would be it should be eye clean and not a yellowish stone. Would appreciate any advice on one of these stones as want to put this confusion to end and purchase one today.

Setting for the stone will be a Halo Setting (that will be the next challenge which split shank halo setting).

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3034170.htm?source=pricescope

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3009312.htm?source=pricescope

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-2982228.htm?source=pricescope

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-2972964.htm


Thanks guys.

 

[sherryd]

If it were me I would choose the last diamond. Not only is it the least amount of money, but they will all look the same side by side
I do believe. As long as it's eye clean to your standards it will be fine. Did you ask them for sure and at what distance and by the side
view? Those diamonds all look georgous to me, and your future fiance will be thrilled to recieve any one of them!

 

[thadanim]

Thanks Sherryd.

Any more suggestions guys. Still have few hours before I pull the trigger, very confused so happy to hear what the experts have to say.

 

[04diamond<3]

Thanks Sherryd.

Any more suggestions guys. Still have few hours before I pull the trigger, very confused so happy to hear what the experts have to say.

I'd choose either the 1.512 H VS2 or the 1.563 H VS2....the 1.51 because it's the same size as the biggest and the ideal scope and the aset look perfect but the 1.563 because I *love* those chunky arrows and it's less expensive.

 

[thadanim]

Thanks Sherryd.

Any more suggestions guys. Still have few hours before I pull the trigger, very confused so happy to hear what the experts have to say.

I'd choose either the 1.512 H VS2 or the 1.563 H VS2....the 1.51 because it's the same size as the biggest and the ideal scope and the aset look perfect but the 1.563 because I *love* those chunky arrows and it's less expensive.

Thanks 04diamond<3. In terms of the aset and ideal scope between the 2 diamonds you like is there much of a difference to an untrained eye ?? Thanks.

 

[04diamond<3]

Thanks Sherryd.

Any more suggestions guys. Still have few hours before I pull the trigger, very confused so happy to hear what the experts have to say.

I'd choose either the 1.512 H VS2 or the 1.563 H VS2....the 1.51 because it's the same size as the biggest and the ideal scope and the aset look perfect but the 1.563 because I *love* those chunky arrows and it's less expensive.

Thanks 04diamond<3. In terms of the aset and ideal scope between the 2 diamonds you like is there much of a difference to an untrained eye ?? Thanks.

To the untrained eye definitely not! But it's a matter of preference. Personally I love the bigger arrows and paying less, but it's really up to you!

 

[bfleming]

Stick with the A cut above stones. 2. Or 4. Ask them to take a video to examine any inclusions. Unless you are pressed for time.

 

[thadanim]

Stick with the A cut above stones. 2. Or 4.

Thanks for your input fleming.

Keep them coming. I am still not sure which one I end up with.

 

[thadanim]

Thanks Sherryd.

Any more suggestions guys. Still have few hours before I pull the trigger, very confused so happy to hear what the experts have to say.

I'd choose either the 1.512 H VS2 or the 1.563 H VS2....the 1.51 because it's the same size as the biggest and the ideal scope and the aset look perfect but the 1.563 because I *love* those chunky arrows and it's less expensive.

Thanks 04diamond<3. In terms of the aset and ideal scope between the 2 diamonds you like is there much of a difference to an untrained eye ?? Thanks.

To the untrained eye definitely not! But it's a matter of preference. Personally I love the bigger arrows and paying less, but it's really up to you![/quote

Thanks 04diamond<3. You are convincing me in following your pick. Will there be a difference in the brilliance fire or scintillation.

 

[04diamond<3]

Thanks 04diamond<3. You are convincing me in following your pick. Will there be a difference in the brilliance fire or scintillation.

They're both ACA stones, so I really wouldn't worry about it. We always say (most of us), when you're comparing stones that both have ideal cuts always go for the bigger

 

[thadanim]

They're both ACA stones, so I really wouldn't worry about it. We always say (most of us), when you're comparing stones that both have ideal cuts always go for the bigger

The 1.563 H VS2 is not a ACA stone but a ES stone hence the question. If both were ACA I would have been 100% convinced by now.

 

[04diamond<3]

They're both ACA stones, so I really wouldn't worry about it. We always say (most of us), when you're comparing stones that both have ideal cuts always go for the bigger

The 1.563 H VS2 is not a ACA stone but a ES stone hence the question. If both were ACA I would have been 100% convinced by now.

Really, it's up to you. If it's worth it to you to spend the extra 2k on an aca stone then do it. You asked if an untrained eye would notice the difference and no, they wouldn't. They're both gorgeous stones and it's up to you at this point. Any stone you get from WF will be gorgeous (in the ES or the aca's).

 

[thadanim]

Really, it's up to you. If it's worth it to you to spend the extra 2k on an aca stone then do it. You asked if an untrained eye would notice the difference and no, they wouldn't. They're both gorgeous stones and it's up to you at this point. Any stone you get from WF will be gorgeous (in the ES or the aca's).

Brilliant. That felt like you got the whip out and said just get 1.563 Unless something drastic happens it shall be this. Thanks once again.

 

[04diamond<3]

Really, it's up to you. If it's worth it to you to spend the extra 2k on an aca stone then do it. You asked if an untrained eye would notice the difference and no, they wouldn't. They're both gorgeous stones and it's up to you at this point. Any stone you get from WF will be gorgeous (in the ES or the aca's).

Brilliant. That felt like you got the whip out and said just get 1.563 Unless something drastic happens it shall be this. Thanks once again.

LOL, that's not how I meant it, but if it works. If getting an aca is really important to you (and to some people here it really is), then I think you should go with what will make you and your FI happy. Either way, you will have a gorgeous stone! Please come back with pictures!!

 

[thadanim]

LOL, that's not how I meant it, but if it works. If getting an aca is really important to you (and to some people here it really is), then I think you should go with what will make you and your FI happy. Either way, you will have a gorgeous stone! Please come back with pictures!!

Not fussed about ACA just want value for money. I guess it is a case of a newbie coming here getting wealth of knowledge and being sucked into it and then aiming for the best. I was going that way but it is about getting best value for my $$. I do not think there will be picture of the stone as most probably will get WF to set it for me. The next mission will be the setting so do not be thinking your job is done !! What i do know in the setting is that I need a split shank halo setting.

 

[04diamond<3]

Well, WF has a few gorgeous options:

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/park-avenue-diamond-engagement-ring-1669.htm

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/verragio-split-shank-pave-diamond-engagement-ring-2011.htm
(profile shot on the above ring is stunning!!)

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/ritani-masterwork-split-shank-diamond-engagement-ring-2087.htm

 

[thadanim]

Well, WF has a few gorgeous options:

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/park-avenue-diamond-engagement-ring-1669.htm

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/verragio-split-shank-pave-diamond-engagement-ring-2011.htm
(profile shot on the above ring is stunning!!)

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/ritani-masterwork-split-shank-diamond-engagement-ring-2087.htm

They are all good but need something very specific.

This one was the original one that was fancied.



After that this setting was fancied and I probably want to go with something like http://www.jamesallen.com/engagemen...g-with-two-diamond-encrusted-bands-item-17351 this but there is something wrong about it and looks to busy and not so delicate as compared to the original. I do not know what modifications i need to make (no technical experties) to fine tune the James Allen ring as I do not need the exact JA ring.

Please feel free to advice as I surely need to get moving on this quick as if i purchase the stone now i rather get them started with the setting immediately.

Tried to contact VC and SK on a couple of occasions but no response so will go with purchasing and setting it with WF.

Thanks.

 

[NDPS]

hey there

i was looking at those stones too in the past few days (ended up with 1.5 I VS2 ACA and was told it was a high I, closer to H and cheaper than the other stones)

i already did the research behind the 1.538HSI1 ACA (scores 1.9 HCA with ex,vg,vg,vg) and 1.512HVS2 ACA (scores 1.1 HCA with ex,ex,ex,vg)

i didnt go with 1.512H cause it was out of budget after exchange rate and taxes in my area and didnt go for 1.538H cause i wanted a mind clean diamond

ask them to pull the diamonds to compare and send you pics side by side, face up, face down and ask for their graduate gemologist opinion, thats how i made my choice

 

[thadanim]

hey there

i was looking at those stones too in the past few days (ended up with 1.5 I VS2 ACA and was told it was a high I, closer to H and cheaper than the other stones)

i already did the research behind the 1.538HSI1 ACA (scores 1.9 HCA with ex,vg,vg,vg) and 1.512HVS2 ACA (scores 1.1 HCA with ex,ex,ex,vg)

i didnt go with 1.512H cause it was out of budget after exchange rate and taxes in my area and didnt go for 1.538H cause i wanted a mind clean diamond

ask them to pull the diamonds to compare and send you pics side by side, face up, face down and ask for their graduate gemologist opinion, thats how i made my choice

Thanks NDPS. I guess you are right about the mind clean. The question is about did I care much about ACA or no. Have asked them to send me pictures and will make the decision today.

 

[NDPS]

i looked into the ES line as well but i figure with their 100% credit ugrade policy, i can change her ACA stone in the future for something of equal or more and honestly, it would cost more anymore (assuming we go into the 2+ carat range) so anything i pay now i will recoup later

maybe save that 2 grand for a pricier ring...i went simple solitaire (again for future upgrade reasons)

 

[thadanim]

i looked into the ES line as well but i figure with their 100% credit ugrade policy, i can change her ACA stone in the future for something of equal or more and honestly, it would cost more anymore (assuming we go into the 2+ carat range) so anything i pay now i will recoup later

maybe save that 2 grand for a pricier ring...i went simple solitaire (again for future upgrade reasons)

Spot on if you looking to upgrade. Don't think will upgrade the e ring if anything get a new one

 

[mns12]

Well, WF has a few gorgeous options:

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/park-avenue-diamond-engagement-ring-1669.htm

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/verragio-split-shank-pave-diamond-engagement-ring-2011.htm
(profile shot on the above ring is stunning!!)

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/ritani-masterwork-split-shank-diamond-engagement-ring-2087.htm

They are all good but need something very specific.

This one was the original one that was fancied.



After that this setting was fancied and I probably want to go with something like http://www.jamesallen.com/engagemen...g-with-two-diamond-encrusted-bands-item-17351 this but there is something wrong about it and looks to busy and not so delicate as compared to the original. I do not know what modifications i need to make (no technical experties) to fine tune the James Allen ring as I do not need the exact JA ring.

Please feel free to advice as I surely need to get moving on this quick as if i purchase the stone now i rather get them started with the setting immediately.

Tried to contact VC and SK on a couple of occasions but no response so will go with purchasing and setting it with WF.

Thanks.

Re: the setting, I agree..not sure of the word I'm looking for but looks "chunky" in that picture. For that amount of money you can definitely find something VERY nice and more delicate. I'm really surprised you didn't hear back from VC (I have no experience with SK).

 

[thadanim]

[quote="mns12

Re: the setting, I agree..not sure of the word I'm looking for but looks "chunky" in that picture. For that amount of money you can definitely find something VERY nice and more delicate. I'm really surprised you didn't hear back from VC (I have no experience with SK).[/quote]

Mns12 I know I cannot find the word or the fix to modify that. According to you is the James Allen one chunky or the picture.

 

[mns12]

[quote="mns12

Re: the setting, I agree..not sure of the word I'm looking for but looks "chunky" in that picture. For that amount of money you can definitely find something VERY nice and more delicate. I'm really surprised you didn't hear back from VC (I have no experience with SK).

Mns12 I know I cannot find the word or the fix to modify that. According to you is the James Allen one chunky or the picture.[/quote]


Sorry, I should of clarified that...the picture from James Allen I do not like. I think your inspiration picture is very pretty!

 

[04diamond<3]

They are all good but need something very specific.

This one was the original one that was fancied.



After that this setting was fancied and I probably want to go with something like http://www.jamesallen.com/engagemen...g-with-two-diamond-encrusted-bands-item-17351 this but there is something wrong about it and looks to busy and not so delicate as compared to the original. I do not know what modifications i need to make (no technical experties) to fine tune the James Allen ring as I do not need the exact JA ring.

Please feel free to advice as I surely need to get moving on this quick as if i purchase the stone now i rather get them started with the setting immediately.

Tried to contact VC and SK on a couple of occasions but no response so will go with purchasing and setting it with WF.

Thanks.

The reason I showed you options at WF is because it's easier if it's all done in one place. I did look at your picture and it definitely looked like something ERD could do:

http://www.engagementringsdirect.com/engagement%20rings-tpid-2.html

I'd try contacting them.

 

[thadanim]

[quote="mns12

Re: the setting, I agree..not sure of the word I'm looking for but looks "chunky" in that picture. For that amount of money you can definitely find something VERY nice and more delicate. I'm really surprised you didn't hear back from VC (I have no experience with SK).

Mns12 I know I cannot find the word or the fix to modify that. According to you is the James Allen one chunky or the picture.

Sorry, I should of clarified that...the picture from James Allen I do not like. I think your inspiration picture is very pretty![/quote]

Thanks. If I cannot modify the James Allen one or find something that appeals will go with the original one.

 

[thadanim]

They are all good but need something very specific.

This one was the original one that was fancied.



After that this setting was fancied and I probably want to go with something like http://www.jamesallen.com/engagemen...g-with-two-diamond-encrusted-bands-item-17351 this but there is something wrong about it and looks to busy and not so delicate as compared to the original. I do not know what modifications i need to make (no technical experties) to fine tune the James Allen ring as I do not need the exact JA ring.

Please feel free to advice as I surely need to get moving on this quick as if i purchase the stone now i rather get them started with the setting immediately.

Tried to contact VC and SK on a couple of occasions but no response so will go with purchasing and setting it with WF.

Thanks.

The reason I showed you options at WF is because it's easier if it's all done in one place. I did look at your picture and it definitely looked like something ERD could do:

http://www.engagementringsdirect.com/engagement%20rings-tpid-2.html

I'd try contacting them.

Yes I agree if everything done under one roof is better and that is what i am aiming for. WF will custom make both so might stick with them, do you suggest better have ERD do it than WF??.

 

[04diamond<3]

Yes I agree if everything done under one roof is better and that is what i am aiming for. WF will custom make both so might stick with them, do you suggest better have ERD do it than WF??.

WF does custom so it may be worth it to ask them about it. Show them your picture and I"m sure they can create something gorgeous. I thought of ERD because they do similar rings....up to you though. WF does beautiful custom work too.

 

[thadanim]

Yes I agree if everything done under one roof is better and that is what i am aiming for. WF will custom make both so might stick with them, do you suggest better have ERD do it than WF??.

WF does custom so it may be worth it to ask them about it. Show them your picture and I"m sure they can create something gorgeous. I thought of ERD because they do similar rings....up to you though. WF does beautiful custom work too.

Just picked up the stone you that you and Gypsy originally suggested. Thank a lot guys !!!!

WF has seen the picture and agreed to create it but I will try to see if I can get a fix on the JA one. I rather stick with WF than jump about considering the logistics involved.

 

[04diamond<3]

Yes I agree if everything done under one roof is better and that is what i am aiming for. WF will custom make both so might stick with them, do you suggest better have ERD do it than WF??.

WF does custom so it may be worth it to ask them about it. Show them your picture and I"m sure they can create something gorgeous. I thought of ERD because they do similar rings....up to you though. WF does beautiful custom work too.

Just picked up the stone you that you and Gypsy originally suggested. Thank a lot guys !!!!

WF has seen the picture and agreed to create it but I will try to see if I can get a fix on the JA one. I rather stick with WF than jump about considering the logistics involved.

YAY!!! So excited for you! Did WF give you a quote for the custom? Does it compare to the JA one? Honestly, if that's what she showed you, I'd stick with that. Some people don't like the double halo that's on the JA ring. Plus the JA ring has their diamonds set differently (prong set instead of bead set which is what was shown in your picture)...but again, up to you.