Need some help on these diamonds

[Lynny0780]

hello, could you guys please tell me what you think about these diamonds? thanks!

#1. ROUND J VS2 0.80ct 61.30% 61.00% EGL 5.94 x 5.91 x 3.63

#2. ROUND J VS2 0.90ct 64.00% 51.00% EGL 6.10 x 6.08 x 3.90

#3. ROUND J SI1 0.90ct 59.00% 63.00% EGL 6.25 x 6.23 x 3.68

#4. ROUND J VS2 0.80ct 61.30% 61.00% EGL 5.94 x 5.91 x 3.63

#5. ROUND I VS2 0.80ct 63.10% 54.00% EGL 5.94 x 5.91 x 3.74

#6. ROUND F SI2 0.70ct 63.10% 64.00% EGL 5.54 x 5.52 x 3.49

#7. ROUND F SI2 0.71ct 61.30% 55.00% EGL 5.72 x 5.69 x 3.50

What do you guys think would be the best out of these choices??

This is the diamond i just bought and then started looking at these options and was wondering if these were better or options than the one i bought, or pretty close to it. also is the diamond i just good?

Round .71 ct J VS2 5.79 X 5.82 X 3.48

 

[Dancing Fire]

if you are looking for cut quality these aren''t it (#1--#6)

#7 mite be ok.

 

[Ellen]

Date: 2/8/2009 1:27:08 AM
Author:Lynny0780
hello, could you guys please tell me what you think about these diamonds? thanks!

#1. ROUND J VS2 0.80ct 61.30% 61.00% EGL 5.94 x 5.91 x 3.63

#2. ROUND J VS2 0.90ct 64.00% 51.00% EGL 6.10 x 6.08 x 3.90

#3. ROUND J SI1 0.90ct 59.00% 63.00% EGL 6.25 x 6.23 x 3.68

#4. ROUND J VS2 0.80ct 61.30% 61.00% EGL 5.94 x 5.91 x 3.63

#5. ROUND I VS2 0.80ct 63.10% 54.00% EGL 5.94 x 5.91 x 3.74

#6. ROUND F SI2 0.70ct 63.10% 64.00% EGL 5.54 x 5.52 x 3.49

#7. ROUND F SI2 0.71ct 61.30% 55.00% EGL 5.72 x 5.69 x 3.50

What do you guys think would be the best out of these choices??

This is the diamond i just bought and then started looking at these options and was wondering if these were better or options than the one i bought, or pretty close to it. also is the diamond i just good?

Round .71 ct J VS2 5.79 X 5.82 X 3.48

Hi Lynn,

There''s not near enough info on your stone to be able to judge. We would need:

Table
Depth
Crown and pavilion angles
Cut grade
Polish
Symmetry
Girdle
Culet

And what lab graded it.

As for the others you picked, again, not enough info. We would need what I listed, but 7 is the only decent prospect at this point.

 

[Lorelei]

Ditto Ellen.

 

[Lynny0780]

yea i dont have that info on the one i bought. but i will try to find it out
but the depth and table are listed on the other ones right after the carat size. Also they are EGL grade.

 

[Lynny0780]

k found it . these are the stats for the diamond i bought. what do you guys think? i paid $1545

Carat weight: 0.71

Cut: Very Good

Color: J

Clarity: VS2

Price per carat: $2,197

Depth %: 63.4%

Table %: 57%

Symmetry: Excellent

Polish: Excellent

Girdle: Thin to slightly thick

Culet: None

Fluorescence: None

 

[Ellen]

The most important info is still missing Lynn, so I can''t really say. If it''s an EGL stone, the report should list (along with this other info) crown and pavilion numbers with %''s after them. If it''s another lab, there should be a diamond diagram, with a number by the top of the diamond (in the 30''s) and one by the bottom (in the 40''s). These are what drive the diamonds light performance, that''s why they are so important.

One thing I see now is the depth. It''s just a bit deeper than what we normally see. I have no idea if it would affect the way the stone performs, but it could possibly be making the diamond look a little bit smaller than it would if it was optimally cut. That''s the diameter (will look something like 5.66 x 5.71 x 3.5, which I forgot to tell you to list. If you can post that, I can let you know.

I know you listed the table and depth for the others, but one has to have all the info to make any kind of guestimate on the stone. Everything works together.

Also, I need to know which lab graded it to comment on the price.