shape
carat
color
clarity

Need some advice on finding.

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

jcu1276

Rough_Rock
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
44
Hi jc,

Either of those would be beautiful, you really can''t go wrong here. I''d personally go for the higher color/lower clarity, IF it''s eyeclean. Need to ask!
 
lol OK, you edited while I was posting!

Well, you''ve got two entirely different shapes here. I can''t tell you which one to get, that''s a personal choice.
 
Thank you for the quick reply. I just added the two princess because, I am also interested in that also. Any suggestions with the round vs. princess cut. I know that it will be a matter of opinions between the two cuts. I just want to know what everyones thoughts will be.
1.gif
 
gosh you are very quick. Its 4am and I''ve been reading late nights on pricescope for the past couple of months.
 
lol Well it''s 6 here, normal to be up.

Have you seen a Princess, and round in person? If not, I would make that a priority. They are different looks. A round has more sparkle, is timeless, and faces up larger than a Princess would of the same ct. weight.

Not discouraging you from the Princess, I happen to love squares, just trying to point out the differences. Also, some feel the Princess is more of a fad, and will eventuially go out of style, whereas the round won''t.

HTH!
 
I really like the look of square diamonds. I just could not bring myself to buy a diamond that looked smaller than a diamond of the same carat weight in round. So I bought a round and put it in a squarish mounting! LOL
 
I second Ellen''s suggestion to view an RB and a Princess next to each other and see which one you (and your GF) like. They truly are two different looks.

I am a princess person myself, so I don''t know much about RBs. You can sort of see the inclusions on the JA stone, but that''s at x16 magnification. You should call to see if it''s eye-clean from 8-10 inches. The WF stone has a less than perfect IS image (symmetry is "good"), but it has a good ASET image so maybe perfect symmetry isn''t a big deal. It could be a sparkler.

However, for both stones, I note that the girdles are Thin-Thick or Med-Thick. I suspect these stones are hiding weight in the girdles b/c both face up less than an ideal 1.5 carat princess should (ideal dimensions should be 6.5 X 6.5, thus a spread of 42). The JA stone has a spread of 38.75 (6.25*6.2) and the WF stone has a spread of 39.3 (6.33*6.21). Princesses rarely face up what they should, but I think you can find stones that face up closer to a spread of 40+. You have a very nice budget (a little more than I do!) and I found a great stone, although it took a LOT of searching.

In addition to searching JA, WF, and GOG, I''d recommend hooking up with a trusted jeweler. I found my diamond through Quest and Pete found diamonds within my parameters at prices I couldn''t find online. Jewelers have their own connections and they may be able to find things you can''t.

Just my $.02 -- HTH!!
 
Hi Everyone,

Thank you for the great tips. I will need to do more research. I have seen both stones in person. The wife to be likes the princess alot. I like the liveliness that the round emits. You are right Ellen, the round has more sparkle and is timeless, and also more $$
4.gif
. I always had the feeling that my GF likes the princess because it is a trendy cut.


Bunnifer,

Your advice is very true. I will make some time to the local diamond district. I need to find a trusted jeweler, like you said. I will take your recommended measurements into account when searching.

Regards,

JC
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top