roxxx_m
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2013
- Messages
- 70
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------04diamond<3|1358570376|3359412 said:If you don't want a gap then the cathedral. The classic will cause a gap because the head is very low so you'd need a curved band or a spacer in between your ering and wedding band.
What size diamond are you looking at (dimension-wise)? If your ring won't have any sidestones, most folks tell you to go for the thinnest band you can get so that your diamond will stand out the most.roxxx_m|1358571541|3359420 said:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------04diamond<3|1358570376|3359412 said:If you don't want a gap then the cathedral. The classic will cause a gap because the head is very low so you'd need a curved band or a spacer in between your ering and wedding band.
I figured and I 'm definitely leaning more towards the cathedral lookWould a 2.5mm be too thick?
roxxx_m|1358571541|3359420 said:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------04diamond<3|1358570376|3359412 said:If you don't want a gap then the cathedral. The classic will cause a gap because the head is very low so you'd need a curved band or a spacer in between your ering and wedding band.
I figured and I 'm definitely leaning more towards the cathedral lookWould a 2.5mm be too thick?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Roxy|1358571906|3359423 said:What size diamond are you looking at (dimension-wise)? If your ring won't have any sidestones, most folks tell you to go for the thinnest band you can get so that your diamond will stand out the most.roxxx_m|1358571541|3359420 said:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------04diamond<3|1358570376|3359412 said:If you don't want a gap then the cathedral. The classic will cause a gap because the head is very low so you'd need a curved band or a spacer in between your ering and wedding band.
I figured and I 'm definitely leaning more towards the cathedral lookWould a 2.5mm be too thick?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------04diamond<3|1358572002|3359425 said:roxxx_m|1358571541|3359420 said:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------04diamond<3|1358570376|3359412 said:If you don't want a gap then the cathedral. The classic will cause a gap because the head is very low so you'd need a curved band or a spacer in between your ering and wedding band.
I figured and I 'm definitely leaning more towards the cathedral lookWould a 2.5mm be too thick?
Nope, I think unless you were getting like a 1/3 ct enter, 2.5 mm will look great! the cathedral is definitely beautiful!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------04diamond<3|1358572381|3359429 said:Ah, I didn't know you had an option. It depends on what your personal preference is then. A 2.5 mm setting will give a bigger look imo...while the smaller will give the ring a more delicate look. So which do you prefer? What is your finger size?
roxxx_m|1358573154|3359438 said:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------04diamond<3|1358572381|3359429 said:Ah, I didn't know you had an option. It depends on what your personal preference is then. A 2.5 mm setting will give a bigger look imo...while the smaller will give the ring a more delicate look. So which do you prefer? What is your finger size?
My ring size is a 4.5, I have a Tiffany Notes ring that I wear everyday and I'm trying to figure out the size of it so that I have a better idea of which of the 2 to get because I love the feel of my Tiffany ring. I tried looking at their website but unfortunately the ring details are not available. Let me link a picture and see if you could help me figure it out. http://www.tiffany.com/Shopping/Ite...4-c+-r+-x+-n+6-ri+-ni+0-t+i+love+you&search=1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------04diamond<3|1358573480|3359440 said:roxxx_m|1358573154|3359438 said:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------04diamond<3|1358572381|3359429 said:Ah, I didn't know you had an option. It depends on what your personal preference is then. A 2.5 mm setting will give a bigger look imo...while the smaller will give the ring a more delicate look. So which do you prefer? What is your finger size?
My ring size is a 4.5, I have a Tiffany Notes ring that I wear everyday and I'm trying to figure out the size of it so that I have a better idea of which of the 2 to get because I love the feel of my Tiffany ring. I tried looking at their website but unfortunately the ring details are not available. Let me link a picture and see if you could help me figure it out. http://www.tiffany.com/Shopping/Ite...4-c+-r+-x+-n+6-ri+-ni+0-t+i+love+you&search=1
hm...I could be wrong, but that looks like it could be a 2mm+ ring...Do you have a ruler or tape measure? If it does happen to be 2 or more mm then I'd think the 2.5 option would be just fine for you. Although, I'd keep in mind that you'll have a wedding band too, and that'll add to the mm on your finger...just a thought.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------echomomm|1358574152|3359443 said:I recently ordered a ring, and the 2.5 wasn't nearly as wide as I had imagined in my head. What you might want to consider is the wedding band you intend to put with it. Is being the same width important to you for a matched look, or do you like the look of different width bands? If you intend to put a diamond band with the solitaire, the 2.5 might be easier to match.
I think your idea to go thinner w/ the Wband is a good one, since you're leaning towards the 2.5 ering. What would help is if you could get something similar in CZ so you could live w/ it a while & see how you feel.roxxx_m|1358574612|3359450 said:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------echomomm|1358574152|3359443 said:I recently ordered a ring, and the 2.5 wasn't nearly as wide as I had imagined in my head. What you might want to consider is the wedding band you intend to put with it. Is being the same width important to you for a matched look, or do you like the look of different width bands? If you intend to put a diamond band with the solitaire, the 2.5 might be easier to match.
Well I dont really favor for the 2 matching. I'd either want the wedding band the same size or smaller than my e-ring band. So smaller than 2.5 if I were to go with the 2.5 of course.
I chose out a few wedding bands and they all fall under 2.5 and the one I liked the most was a 2mm half diamond pave ring.![]()