shape
carat
color
clarity

My setting is unsafe... =(

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

iluvsparkles

Rough_Rock
Trade
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
35
I walked into a local jewelry store that does custom work and repairs to get an estimate on how much it would cost to raise my setting so that when I get a wedding band, it would sit flush against the e-ring.

The jeweler was looking at my ring and he told me that my setting is dangerous and that it was waiting for an accident to happen. He said that the prongs on the four corners are too small and if he were to rotate the stone (cushion cut), it would pop out. He also mentioned that the bridges that were supporting my prongs weren''t actually touching my stone, so it doesn''t give my stone any security. He then said he was surprised that it hasn''t fallen out yet (I''ve been wearing it for almost 4 months).

He told me that I should a) get double prongs and b) raise the bridges so that they''re touching the stone and c) possibly making a ''bed'' for the diamond to sit in.

I''m so upset to hear about it; I know that my FI spent a long time talking about designs. Unfortunately, he bought the ring overseas so taking it back would be difficult. However, what bothers me the most is the fact that if the setting was "unsound", why would the designer and jeweler make it like that without telling my FI the risks?

Can anyone give me some advice on how to approach this situation? I certainly don''t want anything to happen to my ring (I haven''t got the ring insured yet and now I''m scared to wear the ring out).

Originally, I was thinking of whether I wanted to get a re-set. Then I decided that I''ll just raise the setting higher because I didn''t want my FI to feel bad that I didn''t like it. But now, if I have to get work done on it, perhaps I should re-consider getting a new setting altogether. Are there any settings that may be more structurally safe?

Please follow the link to see pictures of my ring (Yona''s E-Ring). It doesn''t show how the bridges don''t touch. I will try to post pictures when I get home from work.

Thanks!

Yona
 
get another opinion, the basic design looks ok to me.
The bridges arent supposed to touch the stone.
 
Date: 6/3/2009 11:34:38 AM
Author: strmrdr

get another opinion, the basic design looks ok to me.
The bridges arent supposed to touch the stone.
That''s what I was going to say. And if it''s by chance the same conclusion, weigh the cost of fixing this one compared to a new one, see where you want to go.
 
Maybe your jeweller is just trying to get you to buy a whole new setting from them? By creating doubt in your mind he might get some extra business from you than just having the setting adjusted.
 
Get insurance. Then you can stop worrying about it.
 
I sure would like to see the photos, but the link does not work..
 
Date: 6/3/2009 12:24:51 PM
Author: purrfectpear
Get insurance. Then you can stop worrying about it.
There’s nothing fundamentally unsafe about the design. It looks to me in the photos like the bridges ARE touching the stone. No?

I agree with the above, this is what insurance is for. It doesn’t change any of the risks but it does make it that you don’t have to worry about it.

Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA
Professional Appraisals in Denver
 
IF the "bridges" between the prongs contact the undersides of the diamond there is not much to be concerned about. I just can''t be sure about if this is the case with the pictures supplied. There is no question that if the diamond is able to turn in the mounting the diamond could pop out. Unless these bridges touch most of the daimond''s pavilion, the security without double prongs is compromised.

Jewelers looking to add to their revenue often criticize the work of other jewelers in order to coerce or induce you to leave them work to modify existing rings. Sometimes there is no justification for their actions and others have good motivations in mind.
 
Thank you everyone for your responses.

denverappraiser, I''ve been staring at my ring close up and I do notice a small gap between the diamond and the bridge. The pictures I had before are taken straight-on so it does look like it sits on the bridges. However, I cut up a thin strip of paper and it went through around the diamond.


oldminer, I think maybe that''s why the jeweler suggested to raise the bridges so it would touch the stone. By doing this or adding double prongs, which one secures the stone more? Is it better to do both?

Another question for the experts, is a "bed" for the stone essentially what the bridges do? I initially thought that the jeweler meant wrapping the bottom of the diamond with metal, but I prefer the "openess" of the ring.

I am definitely going to look into insurance. Although, even with insurance, I know I would be devastated if anything happened to my ring. But I guess that way, I would get something back to purchase another stone I love.

I will try to post more pictures once I figure out how to take a very close up shot (probably from an angle) of the ring.

Thanks for all your help!

Yona
 
I''d take it to a second jeweler for an opinion.
 
Get a second opinion. I''d love to see pics.
 
yep agreed with others, get a second opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top