Find your diamond
Find your jewelry
shape
carat
color
clarity

Looking for 2 carat round

The stone scored very poorly on the HCA with a 5. A good stone should be anywhere from 0 to 2. The HCA helps weed out poor performers. Not all GIA XXX are going to be top performers due to the criteria they use.
https://www.pricescope.com/tools/hca

Are you set on D VVS quality? High colour and clarity makes the stone a bit more attractive but the cut is what catches the eye and sets it apart with the crazy sparkle. High colour gives it that icy cold look and as long as it is eye clean from 6 inches away is really good enough, unless there are cultural reasons or personal preference.
 
If you have that kind of budget, I sincerely recommend contacting Good Old Gold or WhiteFlash. They may not have a stone in stock at the moment, but if they source a stone for you, they can check light performance to be sure you are getting a top quality stone.
 
This stone has the potential to perform well. One thing that makes me nervous is the fact that it is hovering right at the 2 carat mark. One little accident and it is going to take a valuation drop from a 2.01 ct stone to a 1.9x ct stone (price per ct increases at the 2 ct mark). Just something to think about.
 
I have requested B2c Jewels to provide me the ideal scope Image, they will email me soon.
Chrono - do you think I should rather go for smaller stone or little bigger stone?
 
Absolutely your choice, if you are able to find anything with high clarity and colour. My gut feel is that it will be slim pickings with your requirement. The nice thing about going just a smidge under is that you can still call it a 2 ct stone and it will look and measure like a 2 ct stone, all without a 2 ct stone price tag.
 
how about these :

http://www.b2cjewels.com/dd-2414229-2.10-carat-Round-diamond-F-color-VVS2-clarity.aspx

http://www.b2cjewels.com/dd-2708851-2.03-carat-Round-diamond-E-color-VVS2-clarity.aspx

http://www.b2cjewels.com/dd-1892785-2.12-carat-Round-diamond-F-color-VVS1-clarity.aspx

just a friendly FYI that you do not in a million years see any color difference between an F and D even when the 2 stone sit together. I am very color sensitive and i am not able to tell from both top down and from the pavillion view, unless i havea set of master stones with 2 diamonds placed top down on white holders. however you could get a much bigger stone for the same price in F color vs D/E color grades.
 
Chrono|1351786716|3296872 said:
Absolutely your choice, if you are able to find anything with high clarity and colour. My gut feel is that it will be slim pickings with your requirement. The nice thing about going just a smidge under is that you can still call it a 2 ct stone and it will look and measure like a 2 ct stone, all without a 2 ct stone price tag.
Click to expand...

I think I will be comfortable with 2ct or above
 
frankiextah|1351790765|3296891 said:
how about these :

http://www.b2cjewels.com/dd-2414229-2.10-carat-Round-diamond-F-color-VVS2-clarity.aspx

http://www.b2cjewels.com/dd-2708851-2.03-carat-Round-diamond-E-color-VVS2-clarity.aspx

http://www.b2cjewels.com/dd-1892785-2.12-carat-Round-diamond-F-color-VVS1-clarity.aspx

just a friendly FYI that you do not in a million years see any color difference between an F and D even when the 2 stone sit together. I am very color sensitive and i am not able to tell from both top down and from the pavillion view, unless i havea set of master stones with 2 diamonds placed top down on white holders. however you could get a much bigger stone for the same price in F color vs D/E color grades.
Click to expand...

I like 2.12ct, I'll check with b2c jewels for more information on the stone
 
I fully agree with going to F VVS, but I personally would not go to 59% on the table. I think stones are a little more attractive when they have more crown showing. 54-58 is the range I consider, but I'd go 55-57 optimally. 34-34 on crown angle, 60.0-62.3 on depth, and 40.6-41.0 pavilion angle. These measurements usually would get a grade of AGS Ideal cut. I wouldn't settle for less than that if I was spending over $50k on a diamond.
 
I am also not a fan of the look of a 60/60 diamond as well.
 
diamondseeker2006|1351862928|3297299 said:
I fully agree with going to F VVS, but I personally would not go to 59% on the table. I think stones are a little more attractive when they have more crown showing. 54-58 is the range I consider, but I'd go 55-57 optimally. 34-34 on crown angle, 60.0-62.3 on depth, and 40.6-41.0 pavilion angle. These measurements usually would get a grade of AGS Ideal cut. I wouldn't settle for less than that if I was spending over $50k on a diamond.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the Suggestion, I'll check the another stone which meets the proportion that you suggest.
 
sakari_8|1351865187|3297318 said:
diamondseeker2006|1351862928|3297299 said:
I fully agree with going to F VVS, but I personally would not go to 59% on the table. I think stones are a little more attractive when they have more crown showing. 54-58 is the range I consider, but I'd go 55-57 optimally. 34-34 on crown angle, 60.0-62.3 on depth, and 40.6-41.0 pavilion angle. These measurements usually would get a grade of AGS Ideal cut. I wouldn't settle for less than that if I was spending over $50k on a diamond.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the Suggestion, I'll check the another stone which meets the proportion that you suggest.
Click to expand...


Check this diamond from BN

http://www.bluenile.com/diamond-search?track=head#diamonds_pid=LD01534736

This is in range of diamondseeker2006's suggestion. I agree it's a big purchase and you should check all the options available. Will looks for more diamonds that fit your criteria.

Check with BN if they can provide idealscope for this one.
 
Blue Nile does not provide IS, H&A or ASET pictures.
 
Any more news? Have you decided on any of the above diamonds?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Jewelry Blog
PriceScope-Concierge-Ad
Find prime cuts.
Top