Light red/dark red ASET

[teobdl]

This is a BGS diamond so I don't think I should be concerned, but as an example, is it ever a concern that there are distinctly light and distinctly dark red regions of an ASET?

Example: http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/0.854-h-si1-round-diamond-ags-104068959003#!prettyPhoto[gallery2]/0/

The table is distinctly darker red than crown region.

 

[teobdl]

Any thoughts?

In a related thread, a knowledgeable poster seemed to indicate that whole sections should be not be very light, and others very dark...

 

[04diamond<3]

If you look at the aset image on the ags report, then you'll see it's all the same red. The single aset image may have just been taken at a slightly different angle. Really, no need to worry about it.

 

[John P]

No issues. It could be strength of lighting or camera settings. Either way, nothing to worry about.

If you look at the aset image on the ags report, then you'll see it's all the same red.

Good cross-reference. I would note that the ASET imprint on the AGS Report is not an actual photo; it's a computer generated simulation. But it still supports what 04diamond is saying.

 

[04diamond<3]

No issues. It could be strength of lighting or camera settings. Either way, nothing to worry about.

If you look at the aset image on the ags report, then you'll see it's all the same red.

Good cross-reference. I would note that the ASET imprint on the AGS Report is not an actual photo; it's a computer generated simulation. But it still supports what 04diamond is saying.

thank you

 

[John P]

thank you

You're welcome! Nice catch