Kelli
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- May 27, 2008
- Messages
- 5,455
Thanks! I thought it looked pretty juicy tooDate: 9/24/2008 2:38:33 PM
Author: EBree
Yay! That was my favorite. ''Juicy'' is the perfect word to describe it. Also, ''red delicious.''![]()
Anyway, I love it. How will you set it?
Thanks! I waited to see what you were picking because I''d had the Cushion Malaya Garnet in my basket for a few weeks, but wanted to make sure I didn''t snatch it out from under you.Date: 9/24/2008 2:50:30 PM
Author: Kelli
Thanks Miss Pinky and LTP! It''s a 1.36 vvs Malaya Garnet. 8.14x6.12x3.98. I''m pretty much clueless on colored gems, so I don''t know if it was a really great buy or anything, I just LOVED the picture and it reminded me of the candy at my great-grandparents'' house when I was a kid. It was pretty inexpensive ($105) so I went for it.
As for the payment--- the first time I tried to pay it failed, but I was trying to just use a credit card. I don''t know what went wrong as the card is fine, but it worked when I used paypal.
Whoa, that doesn''t seem possible!!!!!Date: 9/24/2008 3:01:58 PM
Author: Upgradable
14k yellow gold antique setting for $35!!! You''d have to have the head changed, but that stone would be beautiful in here!
Ditto! It''s beautiful and the price seems unreasonably low! Thanks for not snatching it from me LTP!! But buy it now so I know I''ll get to see more pictures, and maybe a finished project!!Date: 9/24/2008 3:04:39 PM
Author: LaurenThePartier
Whoa, that doesn''t seem possible!!!!!Date: 9/24/2008 3:01:58 PM
Author: Upgradable
14k yellow gold antique setting for $35!!! You''d have to have the head changed, but that stone would be beautiful in here!
Not in a hurry, just having some fun. Hurrying would be actually rushing ahead and buying something. I''m just seeing what my options are, because shopping is FUN! And I wouldn''t get a rediculously cheap setting that contained diamonds. But I would consider one of those LOGR settings, they are beautiful and penty of people are satisfied with them. This is not hardly my engagement ring, so I''m not going to be all that choosy.Date: 9/25/2008 4:07:08 AM
Author: ma re
Hold it now for a bit! Are you in a hurry, have a train to catch or something? You didn''t even get the stone and already you''re choosing settings! How about waiting at least to see the thing, just to make sure it looks as nice as in the photo and doesen''t have some diferent shades mixed in.
It could look great in rose gold, and that setting you found looks nice, but I''d never buy it cause it''s way too light in weight. At 1.6 grams it is hollow like a water pipe, and any pressure applied on it could cause damage (especially on prongs), in which case a repair would be more expensive than the setting itself, or you''d maybe even lose the stone. Not to mention that every time you reset the stone you risk damaging it in the process. I''d also think twice about ridiculously cheap settings that contain diamonds - those probably start falling out the next day, or are just plain ugly. So I''d suggest either waiting until you save enough for a decent setting (at least 3 grams in weight), or getting a silver one that is a bit more sturdy (heavier). You can have some pink side stones if you''d like something that reminds of rose gold. Not sure about plating though, cause stone would probably have to be taken out every time replating is done.