KC, teehee. I guess we were posting at the same time. I''m glad you see it too. I thought I might be seeing things for a sec.Date: 12/15/2006 3:49:53 PM
Well, I don''t see very much leakage so that is good.
It looks a little like the stone is tilted in the photo though, or something else is off not sure. Anyone else want to comment about this??
Date: 12/15/2006 4:07:22 PM
Okay. Definitely tilted in the pic. No obvious areas of leakage. The reason it scored so low (.5) is because of the shallow pavillion angle. This may cause some head obfuscation, which might I repeat MIGHT cause it to look darker if you tend to hang over the ring as you admire it. If you hold your hand out so that your shadow doesn''t obscure, it shouldn''t have that problem. Garry Holloway (HCA) calls diamonds like these older people diamonds because of changing eyesight when you age, you don''t hold the diamond so close to view it. So keep this in mind before you purchase. Just make sure that you have a good return policy for any reason, and you should be okay. I think that these diamonds need to be seen to be evaluated rather than just written off. The crown angle is a good opposite for this one and it might be a really beautiful diamond. I would want to see it though. HTH