shape
carat
color
clarity

Is Bigger Always Better?

SpencerDane

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
33
I have always loved princess cut diamonds. I know that many women love large, flashy diamonds in their engagement rings, but I really do not. I have a simple princes cut solitaire that has a rather small stone and I absolutely adore it. Are bigger stones better? Do they hold up longer or are they just preferred because they show up more and reflect light better than most small stones.
 

Rivendell

Shiny_Rock
Joined
May 23, 2016
Messages
157
I don't think it is at all. Different people have different tastes.
 

Strawberry129

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
91
That's like asking which is prettier..blue or red?

Pick something that YOU love..whether it's big or small I always say.
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
Bigger is only better if you desire bigger... 8)
 

Houston

Rough_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
15
I would rather have the smaller, high quality, very well cut stone, than the larger, poor quality diamond with poor cutting.

Make that "much rather"
 

AprilBaby

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jul 17, 2008
Messages
13,234
Some people just prefer big. I was just thinking about this with my eternity band. It's .10 pt stones and for me I prefer this size because of all the little flashes. Someone else wants .50's. As Kenny says, people vary.
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
Houston|1477339688|4090123 said:
I would rather have the smaller, high quality, very well cut stone, than the larger, poor quality diamond with poor cutting.

Make that "much rather"

Agreed... but bigger doesn't mean "lesser quality" just like smaller doesn't necessarily mean "high quality"

All things equal, it's whatever you prefer in terms of size. :bigsmile:

Edited to add:

...and what you can afford.
 

PintoBean

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
6,589
No, bigger is not always better. Variety is the spice of life ;-) (except when it comes to husbands... just one PITA husband at a time, please!)

Oh, the irony, my favorite pieces are probably my cheapy plain comfort fit bands from e-weddingbands. :lol: Seriously!
 

VRBeauty

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
11,210
Not in my book!
 

dk168

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
12,492
Not in my book too.

DK :))
 

marcy

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
26,275
Not necessarily. Get the size you like.
 

diamondseeker2006

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
58,547
You know, it's all relative. My diamond is one of the largest in my local group of friends, but when I get together with my PS friends, mine is one of the smallest. I don't worry about it now, even though it took me awhile to adjust to the size I have now. I buy what I love and can afford (with my husband's blessing).

This is really no different than cars, houses, etc. Someone will always have a bigger and better one regardless of what we have. Be content with what you have, or work toward saving for the things that are important to you.
 

canuk-gal

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
25,646
honestly
 

kb1gra

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Jul 6, 2012
Messages
1,118
I much prefer smaller stones. My largest stone is a ~1.3ct and I think it's massive and I would have preferred a .5. My new cushion os 0.46. I can't imagine sporting some of the doorknobs on here - more power to those who can! - but it just does not jive with my lifestyle or who I am at all.
 

Gypsy

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
40,225
No. Whatever you like is what is best for you. "Better" is not a objective standard, it is a subjective one.
 

Dancing Fire

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
33,852
msop04|1477331762|4090072 said:
Bigger is only better if you desire bigger... 8)
Are you referring to diamonds?... :Up_to_something: b/c SIZE means nothing if IT doesn't perform... :wink2:
 

SparkleyCarats

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 7, 2016
Messages
10
I'm sure she was referring to diamonds. LOL I have to agree with everyone else. Find what you love and stick with it. I have known of people who have stuck their nose up at ladies who did not wear engagement or wedding rings that were not at least a few carats in size. For me, I like diamonds that are no more than 2 carats in size. But, if I found one that was tiny and I absolutely loved it, I would not think twice about getting it put in a gorgeous ring setting and wearing it all the time.
 

Diamond_Hawk

Brilliant_Rock
Trade
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
1,229
Hi Spencer,

As you can tell, your question seems to have an easy answer: get what you like.

Often a well cut smaller stone can appear larger than a bigger stone that is poorly cut, adding a whole new element to the discussion.

But the advice remains: get what you like.
 

chamomiletea

Rough_Rock
Joined
Aug 16, 2016
Messages
92
Not for me.
Personally I think after Cut and Colour, Clarity and Carat are a budget issue and depending on preferences the balance between the two will be different for every person. For me I would choose quality as I prefer smaller (but no less sparkly!!!) anyway.
I know this to be true because I own diamonds both ends of the spectrum. I have a 2ct D IF perfectly cut diamond. I also have 3 carat diamond studs that are I colour SI clarity. They are *all* nice and yes they all look the same from a distance but put them together and I can tell the difference side by side which of course you can as they are very different specs. Knowing the studs are I SI does disappoint me, I wont lie. I didn't expect any more IF diamonds don't get me wrong but I thought my husband new me better than that. I wold never ever say anything but I feel he sold me out with the studs... I'd have rathered smaller earrings and colourless vvs clarity. That's why I get upset sometimes on these forums when people assume everyone wants bigger. Now I have these huge studs lol... Anyway first world problems!!! Most people would give their eye teeth to have any diamond no matter the size or quality.
 

Aurora43

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
36
I lose things, often. I cannot afford to spend thousands of dollars on jewelry of any kind. I live in a city where robberies are common. Therefore, smaller is ALWAYS better for me.
 

AdaBeta27

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
1,077
I'll play devil's advocate here, and say that sometimes bigger is better. Deep step cuts, like Asscher and Emerald, really are showcased much better in the larger sizes. An 8mm diameter Asscher, or even a 7mm, will show its steps and windmills off much better than a 6mm Asscher will. There might be some other makes that just are better suited to larger sizes. RB can go either way. Princess might fall somewhere in between. There is more than one way to pattern a Princess, and some of those might look better for larger stones than for smaller ones. It's not just the people that vary, haha.
 

soxfan

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
4,814
I have a 2.28 carat OEC, a 1.59 carat antique pear, and a .93 OEC. My .93 is my best performer. It's SO bright all the way to the edges, that it faces up like a one carat stone. I LOVE my little diamond! :love: :love: :love:
 

Timm

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
46
I know a lot of women have been conditioned to think that bigger is always better (don't kill me for saying that) but sometimes the smaller stones can be just as exquisite as the huge ones. I know I can't afford a humongous stone for my girlfriend, but it will definitely be beautiful.
 

Niel

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
20,044
Objectively, assuming all else equal, yes size is better. To the industry anyways. That's why they cost more. That's why people don't take 2 ct D IF ideal cut rounds and recut them down to .5 ct D If ideal cut rounds.

Doesn't mean there aren't ugly stones at any size. And doesn't mean you can't love whay you have.
 

Sagefemme

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Oct 8, 2015
Messages
290
I think the size and shape of the wearer's hands/fingers make a huge difference and must be part of the formula for what is most flattering. On tiny fingers a big rock can look a bit silly, or even fake! While on big hands a smaller stone may not have the impact desired. So there is no way to make a blanket statement about size.
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
I think the question is odd. Most people have a budget and buy what they think looks nice within that budget. That means deciding which of the four c:s are most important. For some it is carat weight. If you like small stones, congratulations to you. Buy a small stone. I agree with Niel if you want an answer based on statistics.
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top