but if you are going for the whitest one, to my eyes the 1.82 is whitest. I see the "most" color in the 1.9, so in my view from most to least "white" it's : 1.82, 1.87, 2.1, 1.9.Color is so subjective. Only YOU can determine this.
My favorite is the 1.826ct. Looks most white to me from the face up view, and also the side view. I don't like the 1.9ct much at all in either view. The 1.878ct is nice, but honestly I'd take the larger 2.115ct over it as the face up looks prettier to me and there isn't much difference in the side views.
About the band, here you can see how the vatch tapers from wide (near the diamond) downwards to a skinnier point at the bottom of the ring. You can also see where the donut protrudes out on the side and will rub against your wedding band. IMO, you need to avoid this rubbing. Over time it will wear down one or both bands.
A positive note, they have a bridge. The problem is the donut is sitting on the bridge. Had they made the donut start on the main shank then the bridge would be smooth and you could have your wedding band sit flush against the setting.
This could be modified to work.
As far as Vatche premiums, etc. I've seen one in-person, as one of my really good friends bought his girl a 2 carat princess with Vatche X-prong setting. It was so simple, yet gorgeous. In their case, they were the only in our circles that used palladium at the time and none of the local jewelers messed with it. There was some issues with the metal type, and they eventually replaced to platinum and had no more issues.
Metal issues aside, I always though the Vatche was awesome in a less is more way. I don't always see that in e-rings.
Color is very subjective. I honestly can barely tell the difference between those 4 choices in terms of color, so my choice would be the largest one
You can always upgrade .
I have the Vatche U113 and a WF ACA J and am thrilled with it! It is SO white! I did ask Liza to check out all the J's I was interested in and find the "least J" so maybe that helps, but I would not be too worried. I love the Vatche setting as well, it is so elegant and the diamond height is just right.
And should be around your price range unless they hike up the price quite a bit. Check with your SA to ask Brittany about it. Suffice it to say, it was an emotional decision to trade this one in because by far, it was THE whitest J I have ever owned over a period of 15yrs. It's just a little too small. 
Had it been the size I wanted, I would have kept it for life. I don't want to post too much about it on here because I honestly don't know how long it takes WF to post a stone once it's been cleared (it was checked, not a thing wrong with it). But I did want to give you a heads up. My new stone will be a bit more tinted but it's bigger so I hope the size whore in me appreciates it! 
Hi Jade,
If your stone hasn't shipped yet, consider waiting a few days. The 2.11 is a nice looking stone no doubt.
As an owner of several J's, there are some that are more tinted than others that's for sure. I know there will be an absolutely eye clean, 2.23 SI-1 , J, Medium Fluoro, Expert Selection 8.37 x 8.41mm in their inventory very soon.
Good luck!
Color is such a subjective matter. What is white or yellow to one may or may not be the same to another person.
The matter is further complicated by the fact there is more disparity in the lower colors like I & J. So you start to see high I's that may be closer to an H, or a low I that may be almost a J. Also, as you dip further down the color levels, the subjectivity expands meaning maybe it's no longer hi, medium and low but it may have 5 variables of color.
At the end of the day, you have to trust your eyes with what looks good to you and your SO. Most people would be very happy with an H. All covert conversations with my girl indicated an H would be likely be okay (even though I can see some tint). Imagine my surprise sitting at dinner one night and she asks why her diamond is yellow.
Conversations followed. She is very color sensitive but refuses to let me trade out the stone. At this point, I think it bothers me more than her. I mention this because while we can be color sensitive, there is also a thing called color tolerance meaning you see the tint but you accept it for what it is.
FYI, not to rush you -- but both the 1.826ct and 1.926ct stones are being considered by another PS member, in a different thread.
300x240.png)
