speedy0514
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2011
- Messages
- 25
Hi folks - first time posting, but I've been reading the forums A LOT over the past few weeks.
I've been looking for a 0.75ct round for an engagement ring and have been shopping around both in-store and online. The problem is, I've had a very difficult time detecting difference in brilliance and light performance while in-store. I think it's for a couple reasons, mostly the in-store lighting and the fact that the jewelers keep pulling diamonds with low end cut grades. I'll say, "could i see the difference between equivalent color/clarity diamonds where one is a really well cut stone and the other a more poorly cut stone." And they inevitably return with a stone in the fair cut category and a stone in the good cut category, never exceeding VG/VG in polish or symmetry either.
So when I shop online, I see stones on paper that have ideal cut measurements, polish and symmetry - and from the wisdom and experience of others, it sounds like they should be absolutely stunning compared to the poorly cut stones I've looked at in store. But since I've never seen an ideal cut stone in person, I have a hard time rationalizing the added premium for the ideal cut.
So here's an example of two equally priced stones:
Whiteflash ACA:
AGS: 0.75 ct, F, VS2, Ideal cut, Ideal/Ideal
Local Jeweler
GIA: 0.71ct, E, VVS1, Fair cut, Good/Fair
From what I've read, this is a no brainer, right? Go with the ACA because of the huge advantage in cut quality. The only reason I hesitate is because I haven't seen the substantial impact of cut in person. I just need some reassurance.
Thanks you in advance for your thoughts!
I've been looking for a 0.75ct round for an engagement ring and have been shopping around both in-store and online. The problem is, I've had a very difficult time detecting difference in brilliance and light performance while in-store. I think it's for a couple reasons, mostly the in-store lighting and the fact that the jewelers keep pulling diamonds with low end cut grades. I'll say, "could i see the difference between equivalent color/clarity diamonds where one is a really well cut stone and the other a more poorly cut stone." And they inevitably return with a stone in the fair cut category and a stone in the good cut category, never exceeding VG/VG in polish or symmetry either.
So when I shop online, I see stones on paper that have ideal cut measurements, polish and symmetry - and from the wisdom and experience of others, it sounds like they should be absolutely stunning compared to the poorly cut stones I've looked at in store. But since I've never seen an ideal cut stone in person, I have a hard time rationalizing the added premium for the ideal cut.
So here's an example of two equally priced stones:
Whiteflash ACA:
AGS: 0.75 ct, F, VS2, Ideal cut, Ideal/Ideal
Local Jeweler
GIA: 0.71ct, E, VVS1, Fair cut, Good/Fair
From what I've read, this is a no brainer, right? Go with the ACA because of the huge advantage in cut quality. The only reason I hesitate is because I haven't seen the substantial impact of cut in person. I just need some reassurance.
Thanks you in advance for your thoughts!