I think I found the one for her. Just checking.

[took86]

So I was advised to search for a round with the following parameters:

Table: 54-58
Depth: 60-62.3
Crown: 34.0-35.0 (and maybe up to 35.5 with a 40.6 crown angle)
Pavilion 40.6-41

I searched and found a round 1.96 I-Color VS2 with the following numbers:
Table: 59%
Depth: 61%
Crown: 34
Pavilion: 40.8

Considering the table is only 1% above the recommended, should this be a big issue?

I've also attached the H&A photos they sent me.

The HCA tool scored it below the 2.0 mark. I'm really excited about this one, just making sure I'm in the clear on quality?

THANK YOU AGAIN!

 

[gm89uk]

There's nothing wrong with a 59% table only it just makes the diamond look a little different. It may have slightly less fire than a diamond with a smaller table such as 55 for example (all else being equal). But really it's more of a different flavour that's all.

The hearts and arrows looks pretty good, have you got an idealscope/aset picture? H&A do not tell you anything about the diamonds light performance other than it is pretty symmetrical.

 

[took86]

I contacted the seller and they said they didn't have the idealscope/ASET photos :/

On paper, the rock sounds like a good stone, but I'm concerned it doesn't show up as such.

They do have a 30-day return policy though!

 

[gm89uk]

If you're seen it in person and you don't like it very much why are you pursuing the purchase? Have you looked stones you like more?