how about this proportions..

[scarleta]

How would you evalute this one 1.43 , F, vvs2 , cut symetry and polish exc ( GIA)
D 61.1 , T 56, Crown a 34.5, Pav d 43,
Thanks a million.
sorry forgot it scored 1.2

 

[scarleta]

anyone knows or did I miss something here?

 

[scarleta]

is this one not good? Any takers? Please and thank you..

 

[Regular Guy]

Are you asking to confirm that 1.2 is between 0 and 2. I can confirm!

This is a good beginning. The only thing unclear is how good enough that is.

For example, why did you report the pavilion percent. When crown angle is available, that is favorable.
Other aids can be ideal scope images, more detailed info on more facets, and such.

But this is a good beginning!

 

[scarleta]

Thanks Ira Z: I thought pav angle is needed to help in evaluation.? that''s why I posted it ..

 

[pricescope]

Hi Scarleta, Ira is asking whether you know pavilion angle because you posted pavilion depth %, which also might be rounded (i.e. not very accurate).

 

[scarleta]

So very sorry Pav angle is 40.8 crown angle is 34.5. Thanks for taking time to clarify this for me... Hope this helps . I have been educating myself here for a while and getting ready to " pull the trigger " soon..Still need your help..

 

[scarleta]

Got it now sorry for the confusion pav angle is 40.8 What else do I need to get?

 

[Regular Guy]

Sorry to make you think this was a useless exercise. We can see it''s still 1.2, (I didn''t check you before), and seemingly in a very sweet spot.

Unless you have more data to discriminate from, like either pictures, or more detailed info about other angles, you either a) get more info such as this, or b) pull the trigger, and do more comparison or evaluative due diligence, comparing yourself the actual item, or asking a professional to evaluate with/for you.

Proportions really sweet, a) for AGS0, b) GIA X, and c) HCA.

 

[scarleta]

c.HCA not sure what that is?
Thanks Ira , I like the proportions too, what else should I be asking for to properly evaluate it? What would be an ideal price range for stone like this one? Any help is apprecieated..

 

[Regular Guy]

Date: 12/17/2006 2:33:38 PM
Author:scarleta
How would you evalute this one 1.43 , F, vvs2 , cut symetry and polish exc ( GIA)
D 61.1 , T 56, Crown a 34.5, Pav d 43,
Thanks a million.
sorry forgot it scored 1.2

HCA = (Holloway) cut advisor score = your reported 1.2

 

[scarleta]

thanks Ira for clarifying it for me once more..

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

Seems good.

There can be a small chance that there are other problems.
An ideal-scope image or sending it to an appraiser could give more certainty.

 

[scarleta]

thanks Gary , ideal scope image is this something I do? and post here? Thanks