That's fine. You can find me as vile and disgusting as you like. I'm pretty (read: totally) unbothered by your hatred.
I am, however, bothered by the shocking number of mass murders committed by guns in the US. And being told by second amendment absolutists (most of whom laughably refer to themselves as 'originalists') that it's "not the time nor the place to “prevent further tragedies” with anti-gun messages when bodies are still bleeding out on the floor" smacks of emotional blackmail from a group who will never believe there's an appropriate time or place for that discussion, and so, carries zero weight with me.
IMO, At least one of the parent should be a US citizen before the child is granted as a US citizenship at birth.Trump said his lawyers told him he could change the 14th amendment LOL. He only hires the best! What a liar. Can this man EVER tell the truth?
I have been following this thread since the start along with the Kavanough thread which you are referring to in the quote above...not one single person suggested or demanded that you "believe all women".The behavior he/she condoned is why I find him/her vile & disgusting. Read the entire exchange. No different than you or others on here finding my inabaility to ‘believe all women’ the same. Opinions ...
I have been thinking about this today and I am not sure how he plans to do this. There are several different explanations/interpretations of the 14th being discussed out there. The intention was not for foreign born people to come here to have babies in order for them to be US citizens as is happening now. I guess we'll see how this pans out but he is probably talking out of his ass on the EO because of midterms coming up. He can't change an amendment to the Constitution with an EO.
I don't think the intention of the 2nd amendment was for citizens to have as many guns as they want, to have AK 47s. The intention was for a group of 'men' to form a militia together, but we live with the over the top interpretation by the right.
Yea, especially in Chicago ... Why isn’t Obama Monday-morning quarter-tweeting about the violent gun crime there after repeated weekends of bloodshed on his own hometown streets? :crickets:
I can't tell what you are complaining about. Originally it was that you felt strongly that our gun violence problem should not be addressed while there were bodies still on the ground. Now it sounds like it upsets you that Obama spoke out about tougher gun control laws before visiting UCC victims families but didn't regularly do the same for the families of Chicago gun violence victims. Which is it - should he be have been speaking out or not? When? What did you feel so strongly about again?
IMO, the reason politicians and citizens in general don't address what's going on in Chicago is because the violence is mostly restricted to the poorest neighborhoods, is gang-related, and usually doesn't qualify as a "mass shooting." It doesn't affect our psyche the way a shooting at a synagogue, temple, movie theatre, rock concert, school, does. We have no reason to be in a gang infested Chicago neighborhood so we gloss over any news about what goes on there. We also tend not to notice ordinary gun deaths. A child killed by a gun accident in a home is no big deal to us. You have to have a whole group of them slaughtered for people to get anguished about it for a couple of months.
I have been following this thread since the start along with the Kavanough thread which you are referring to in the quote above...not one single person suggested or demanded that you "believe all women".
People were dismayed that when the hearing was examined as a whole, you found him to be more credible than Dr Ford That conversation escalated when you were unable to debate why you believed him over her without the conversation deteriorating into a castigation of feminism and the insinuation that anyone who believed her to be more credible, was clearly spellbound by the "me too" movement.
No one suggested that you were vile or disgusting for not believing her. While many may have disagreed with you on that point you decided to start with the name calling and feminism bashing and the exchange went down hill quickly from there. I believe that many on both sides have realized that they let things get heated and out of control in that thread and many apologies were made.
How can she write a book if she have forgotten so many details of the ordeal? Where is the house? how she got there? how she left?@Octo2005 PS - Kavanaugh has declined the GoFundMe money raised for him, which doesn’t surprise me in the least. Has Ford? Last I read, she is shopping book deals ... ‘nothing to gain’ my backside.
Sadly she made herself very clear. Equally sad is the ignorance that abounds.Have to agree with @Bonfire here...maybe MD will rephrase.
Ford said she was sexually assaulted by Kav., but none of her friends can corroborate her story ?@Dancing Fire, Clearly your comment was made to anger those who have been sexually assaulted. Like I have stated before, statistically the odds are pretty great that one of your daughters or granddaughters will be sexually assaulted in their lifetime.
Yup, Like DF.PS MEMBERS, You are about to lose this thread.
No name calling, death threats, disparaging names tossed at political leaders, etc. Keep it civilized discussion.
Act.Like.Adults.
Have to agree with @Bonfire here...maybe MD will rephrase.
Sadly she made herself very clear. Equally sad is the ignorance that abounds.
I comprehend her post just fine , thank you DebI suggest you both reread what she wrote. You are inferring far too much. All she said was that individual shootings that occur do not have the emotional impact of mass shootings.
AGBF
@Maria D Quote. IMO, the reason politicians and citizens in general don't address what's going on in Chicago is because the violence is mostly restricted to the poorest neighborhoods, is gang-related, and usually doesn't qualify as a "mass shooting." It doesn't affect our psyche the way a shooting at a synagogue, temple, movie theatre, rock concert, school, does. We have no reason to be in a gang infested Chicago neighborhood so we gloss over any news about what goes on there. We also tend not to notice ordinary gun deaths. A child killed by a gun accident in a home is no big deal to us. You have to have a whole group of them slaughtered for people to get anguished about it for a couple of months.Quote
Chicago has some of the toughest gun laws in the country for one thing, along with a long standing corrupt Democratic government. Gang related, yes. Poorest neighborhoods only? Not exclusively, no. Your comments are offensive to say “It doesn’t affect our psyche the way a shooting at a synagogue, temple, movie theater, rock concert, school does. We have no reason to be in a gang infested Chicago neighborhood so we gloss over any news about what goes on there.” In your opinion (and you are speaking collectively for the rest of us apparently) as long as we (I take that to mean privileged white people) don’t frequent poor black neighborhoods in Chicago, we can gloss over the thousands of shootings that occur there because that doesn’t effect “us”. What an interesting interpretation you have. Certainly racist comes to mind and uninformed.
From August of 18. (edited because I cant read!)
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news...ce-gun-rahm-mccarthy-0812-20180810-story.html
According to what I read, there has been poor government, systemic poverty, limited to small areas of Chicago, mainly black, and that is not racist, that is fact, there's a difference. Cuts in social programs has hurt these areas, access to guns, uncooperative citizens who fear police and don't want to snitch.
Your post sounds to me as though you perhaps thinks it's entirely just democratic caused, I don't so but certainly they should take a lot of the blame crime is declining there. We just need to hone up the commuity and the cops so they can trust each other. I think that would go a long way to catching more of the criminals/killers etc.
This is an opinion piece my a liberal columnist for the Trib. You need to read much more than this to get caught up on the dynamic of gang shootings plaguing Chicago. @maria D’s comment “we have no reason to be in a gang infested Chicago neighborhood so we gloss over any news about what goes on there.” Maybe her opinion, even though she speaks for others, but it’s a blatantly racist and ignorant comment. I guess black on black gangbangers shooting each other and those in their crossfire isn’t worthy of your notice or empathy. It’s only about what effects YOU. Democratic leadership is only one of the problems in Illinois...research more.From August of 18. (edited because I cant read!)
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news...ce-gun-rahm-mccarthy-0812-20180810-story.html
According to what I read, there has been poor government, systemic poverty, limited to small areas of Chicago, mainly black, and that is not racist, that is fact, there's a difference. Cuts in social programs has hurt these areas, access to guns, uncooperative citizens who fear police and don't want to snitch.
Your post sounds to me as though you perhaps thinks it's entirely just democratic caused, I don't so but certainly they should take a lot of the blame crime is declining there. We just need to hone up the commuity and the cops so they can trust each other. I think that would go a long way to catching more of the criminals/killers etc.
@Maria D Quote. IMO, the reason politicians and citizens in general don't address what's going on in Chicago is because the violence is mostly restricted to the poorest neighborhoods, is gang-related, and usually doesn't qualify as a "mass shooting." It doesn't affect our psyche the way a shooting at a synagogue, temple, movie theatre, rock concert, school, does. We have no reason to be in a gang infested Chicago neighborhood so we gloss over any news about what goes on there. We also tend not to notice ordinary gun deaths. A child killed by a gun accident in a home is no big deal to us. You have to have a whole group of them slaughtered for people to get anguished about it for a couple of months.Quote
Chicago has some of the toughest gun laws in the country for one thing, along with a long standing corrupt Democratic government. Gang related, yes. Poorest neighborhoods only? Not exclusively, no. Your comments are offensive to say “It doesn’t affect our psyche the way a shooting at a synagogue, temple, movie theater, rock concert, school does. We have no reason to be in a gang infested Chicago neighborhood so we gloss over any news about what goes on there.” In your opinion (and you are speaking collectively for the rest of us apparently) as long as we (I take that to mean privileged white people) don’t frequent poor black neighborhoods in Chicago, we can gloss over the thousands of shootings that occur there because that doesn’t effect “us”. What an interesting interpretation you have. Certainly racist comes to mind and uninformed.