Hi,
I've narrowed down my search to the following 2 diamonds. Both fared well with the HCA test, scoring in the 1.7-1.8 range.
1) GIA 2287254241
- Triple Excellent
- 1.51 carat
- F color
- VS2
- Faint fluorescence
2) GIA 2288993491
- Triple Excellent
- 1.52 carat
- F color
- VS2
- None fluorescence
If you are able to compare the actual GIA reports, all the individual measures (except table depth) on the first diamond fall within the ideal range whereas the second one is a bit all over the place. My question is whether I should be prioritizing the better individual measures despite the faint fluorescence found on the first one or avoid faint fluorescence at all costs. I’ve seen both in person and they both look equally great. The first diamond is also cheaper by around 3-5%.
Any insight is appreciated.
A
I've narrowed down my search to the following 2 diamonds. Both fared well with the HCA test, scoring in the 1.7-1.8 range.
1) GIA 2287254241
- Triple Excellent
- 1.51 carat
- F color
- VS2
- Faint fluorescence
2) GIA 2288993491
- Triple Excellent
- 1.52 carat
- F color
- VS2
- None fluorescence
If you are able to compare the actual GIA reports, all the individual measures (except table depth) on the first diamond fall within the ideal range whereas the second one is a bit all over the place. My question is whether I should be prioritizing the better individual measures despite the faint fluorescence found on the first one or avoid faint fluorescence at all costs. I’ve seen both in person and they both look equally great. The first diamond is also cheaper by around 3-5%.
Any insight is appreciated.
A