shape
carat
color
clarity

Help: Which large RB would you pick? Which is cut better?

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

francesfarmer

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
97
If given the choice between the pictured two RBs as your e-ring, which would you choose?
The larger is supposed to be 4.5 carats. It has a very warm color and one visible but well hidden inclusion

The smaller is supposed to be 4 carats. It has many black and white very visible inclusions, but a much whiter color.

Also, I know its hard to tell since they are mounted, but is one cut better than the other?

Either would be remounted in a tiffany style (maybe suberbcert) setting
 

francesfarmer

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
97
Smaller is on the left. Can you tell which is cut better?

CLOSEUP Apr 2008 033.jpg
 

Circe

Ideal_Rock
Trade
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
8,087
An interesting conundrum! Personally speaking, I love warmth, and the single visible inclusion doesn''t bother me, but the salt-and-pepper effect of the more included stone would drive me crazy. To my eye, the bigger stone is just, well, prettier ... but before you make a decision, please, take both rings to an appraiser! Cut is immensely important, and pretty much impossible to gauge via pictures.

P.S. - Is price a factor in the decisions, are they family stones, great local deals, is this a purely hypothetical question ...? I''m just wondering why the choice is between these two specifically (if I''m being nosy, apologies - just curious!).
 

neatfreak

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
14,169
Personally I would pick the one with warmth because I absolutely cannot stand black inclusions. Period.
 

francesfarmer

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
97
Thank you for your help!
I''m leaning toward the larger one - I actually prefer the smaller size, but as you said, the inclusions are very obvious, and I think that would bother me as well.
Price is not an issue - whichever (one) of the stones I choose I will keep, free.
 

diamondseeker2006

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
58,547
Wow, what a nice problem to have! I think the inclusions are less obvious in the larger one, so I would choose it, probably. I also love the baguette setting and think it would be beautiful if polished! That is like a Harry Winston setting, so keep that in mind before you switch it to a Tiffany repro setting.
 

iheartscience

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 1, 2007
Messages
12,111
Date: 4/26/2008 5:51:23 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
Wow, what a nice problem to have! I think the inclusions are less obvious in the larger one, so I would choose it, probably. I also love the baguette setting and think it would be beautiful if polished! That is like a Harry Winston setting, so keep that in mind before you switch it to a Tiffany repro setting.

Ditto!

I''d definitely go for the warmer colored stone. The other one has lots of inclusions and I don''t think I could handle that! I also love the baguette setting as is, personally!
 

canuk-gal

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
25,741
HI:

Ceteris paribus I''d choose the J colored stone--the other appears too murky for my taste.
1.gif
Good luck on your decision!

cheers--Sharon
 

erica k

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Nov 1, 2006
Messages
786
the larger one looks like it might be better cut. could you take photos of each stone, one at a time in macro mode?

oh, and i''d rather have a warmer color stone than one with several black inclusions. i have a F SI2 with a black inclusion, but i don''t mind so much because it''s very small to see, and a small stone (1/2 ct).
 

purrfectpear

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
4,079
Since they''re both flawed, I''d go big
2.gif


Besides better one inclusion than a bunch, no?
 

diamondfan

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jun 17, 2005
Messages
11,016
the right one is clearly warmer from the side view. From the top it is not so bad. But the color might bother me.
 

Ice Princess Cristy

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
152
I personally would never be able to get past the inclusions.... it would be something that would make me self concious and I would also be feeling like I needed to clean it.....
Most wouldn''t notice the coloring, and some people even prefer a warmer color. I would definately get them appraised..... did I miss the reason you were looking at only those 2?
 

francesfarmer

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
97
I really appreciate everyone''s advice. I took around 100 photos of both of them, in macro mode, but I don''t know if I have individual photos - I can''t take any more at the moment bc the rings are back in their safe deposit box at the bank, but I can post more pics...

Also, the reason I want to reset the stone is because I want it to look more modest, and I prefer very low settings - these things are very unwieldy! I''m a young woman. I like the baguettes too though.

The reason I''m only considering these two rings is because they''re in the family so I get to pick one.
 

francesfarmer

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
97
the larger one before I cleaned it. It has a wrap wedding band, but I feel like Mr. T with both of them on!

CLOSE UP Apr 2008 002.jpg
 

francesfarmer

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
97
The larger one, again before I cleaned it. Any ideas about the cut?

CLOSE UP Apr 2008 005.jpg
 

francesfarmer

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
97
neither had been cleaned at this point.

CLOSE UP Apr 2008 017.jpg
 

francesfarmer

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
97
Again before they were cleaned, but you get the idea

CLOSE UP Apr 2008 024.jpg
 

cwj

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
366
I vote for the bigger one! Oh but please give that baby a bath!!!

Please post pictures when u decide,
 

Anastasia

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
451
How cool to have two ginormous family stones to choose between!

I too love the larger one - hands down. The inclusions in the smaller one would really bother me. I am not terribly color sensitive, but I would definitely take lower color over more inclusions any day.

I agree about the setting. I love it in the baguette setting, and would love to see it polished up. If I were you, I would have it polished up, and wear it for a while in the baguette setting before having it reset. If it still feels unwieldy to you, then have it reset. I''m not a huge fan of the baguette wrap for a young woman, but I would hold onto it. Maybe when you are older, you would like to wear them together. I just love the idea of getting to wear an heirloom.
 

coatimundi_org

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
6,281
Larger one with fewer inclusions fo sho! My eagle eye can't handle inclusions!

I like the baguette setting too!
 

waterlilly

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
955
FEWER inclusions - no contest if it were my choice. Lucky you!
 

diamondseeker2006

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
58,547
The table size looks pretty good on the larger stone. At least it does not have a huge table with a little crown. But even if it had a poor cut, you could easily have it recut into a very nice 3+ ct. stone!

(Incidentally, I love the baguette setting, but I also wouldn''t wear that wrap band. A baguette eternity ring would look better, IMO.
 

Diamond*Dana

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
7,341
I would go for the lesser of the flawed...I agree, you are a lucky gal to have this decision to make!
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top