Yes, I love your setting, by the way. You and Caysie did an amazing job. On the face up size chart above, I calculated the surface area, and the 3.65 is 98% the same size as this one. I agree the visual impact may be different.
I feel like I see a big bow tie. Maybe you don’t see it IRL?
Hello! Thank you for weighing in!
Yes, the photos show a big bow tie. I had asked about that above (whether it's the camera, or something about taking photos) but I think it was lost in my photo mess, because it's terrible in those pics, but in real life it seems pretty uncommon (though that said, the light here is terrible as it's snowy and overcast, so I'm not getting a full range of lighting conditions).
,I tend to only get really excited about things once I decide to get them
a bow tie
I just think the facets turn on and off. Since the stone moves, that might not be an issue. Let me work on the price question.
Thank you very much for looking into the price question. Grace seems to have another buyer (hence the pressure to decide) so a lower offer is not in cards.
Not necessarily. Maybe the other person is making an offer less than asking price. Of course if you love it, it may be worth paying full price, but I rarely do that. However, I don't think the price is bad, either.
I think the bow tie is that pattern of dark across the "waist" of the diamond from head obstruction? I was thinking the camera may be making that worse here. Am I right in thinking you like the look of the stone?... I understand that this reffers to the assymetry of the ASET pattern, counting steps from the culet to the long and the short facets ... There is more black accross the long facets.
The stone is rectangular, so its pattern of optical reflections ins't square either, methinks.
Not something I'd find fault wih (IHMO, it 'works' beautifully in many ways).
2c
Am I right in thinking you like the look of the stone?
No one is a bigger fan of Yoram than me. I would adore having one of his asschers especially if I didn't already have one! But custom cutting is rather risky. SI in step cut may or may not be acceptable. I would not take the risk on custom cutting a large stone. Way too much risk. I am basing this on a custom cut 5 ct antique cushion that turned out to have SI2 clarity with a very visible inclusion. I'd only custom cut I was aiming for VS1 clarity because that is going to be eyeclean for sure!
I'd offer a couple thousand less, personally. But only if you think you love the stone.
ctd.
Since I called this one 'modern', I went to look for an old specimen, starting at 1st Dibs - where there seem to be three old style examples (aside some Deco non-corner cut ones... which I imagine are irrelevant ... ), above 2 cts (haven't looked below), of which only one (this WWW) less than 100K (if you like clicking, here are the other two: WWW an WWW)
I am not seriously expecting to find a suitable one fast !
I'd only custom cut I was aiming for VS1 clarity because that is going to be eyeclean for sure
I think that's the one at jbg but at a very inflated price!
Yes, i think youre totally right. I had forgotten about that avr .... I'm generally better with off the shelf than custom on other things.
I think that's the one at jbg but at a very inflated price!
Ha, ok that makes sense - gorgeous. What do you think of the stone overall? A lower price is apparently not an option.Ha! That was the inspiration ring for the 3.65 in CVB setting that Grace has on consignment! That stone is over 4 cts.
https://www.1stdibs.com/jewelry/rin...art-deco-diamond-engagement-ring/id-j_329612/
Not an antique but closest I could find. SI2 definitely would lower the price, but your stone has greater weight.
https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/emerald-cut/4.01-carat-i-color-si1-clarity-sku-3454704
I would always offer less.
I do agree with Valeria that the windmills do not meet in the center to a nice culet facet, so it doesn't scream antique asscher to me. I think you need to decide if you love it for what it looks like.