Help me choose!

[Klee_Bee]

Hello everyone! I ask you for help: does this stone seem good to you in terms of proportions? I'll show you the measurements

Depth %	62.1
Table %	56.0
Crown Angle	34.6
Pavilion Angle	40.9
Crown %	15.0

https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-di...-vvs2-clarity-round-ideal-cut-lab-sku-p266758

Thanks a lot for your help!!

 

[dylanandtyler]

Hi Klee_Bee,

I'll let the experts chime in on this, but here's another site to help you check it's "value" in terms of pricing,

Price and quality scores for IGI Number LG591397382

View the fair price estimate, Cut Score® and price history for IGI Certified Diamond LG591397382. Everything you need to know to buy this diamond.

www.stonealgo.com

 

[Klee_Bee]

Hi Klee_Bee,

I'll let the experts chime in on this, but here's another site to help you check it's "value" in terms of pricing,

Price and quality scores for IGI Number LG591397382

View the fair price estimate, Cut Score® and price history for IGI Certified Diamond LG591397382. Everything you need to know to buy this diamond.

www.stonealgo.com

Thanks!! So is it priced too high for its value? the problem is: I would like to buy from WF because I would like to mount the stone on a u113 vache, so even if I found cheaper stones in terms of pricing from other stores I couldn't buy them elsewhere

 

[Kim N]

I prefer this one in the same price range.

Diamond | 2.91 ct D VS1 Round Cut Precision Lab Grown Diamond IGI Certified | 357043

This fabulous 2.91 carat Round Ideal cut diamond has a clarity grade of VS1 and color grade of D.It is an excellent choice for engagement rings. | 357043

www.whiteflash.com

 

[Klee_Bee]

I prefer this one in the same price range.

Diamond | 2.91 ct D VS1 Round Cut Precision Lab Grown Diamond IGI Certified | 357043

This fabulous 2.91 carat Round Ideal cut diamond has a clarity grade of VS1 and color grade of D.It is an excellent choice for engagement rings. | 357043

www.whiteflash.com

Thanks! Can i ask you why?

 

[Kim N]

Thanks! Can i ask you why?

The cut precision looks a little tighter, and the proportions are Tolkowsky ideal. I also prefer the larger D VS1 combo to a smaller E VVS2.

 

[Klee_Bee]

The cut precision looks a little tighter, and the proportions are Tolkowsky ideal. I also prefer the larger D VS1 combo to a smaller E VVS2.

Thank you very much! Every time I learn something new from all of you

 

[Klee_Bee]

@DejaWiz can i also ask you opinion?

 

[0515vision]

See the teeny triangles at the base of the arrows? You can also see them on the other enface images. That’s a bit of pavilion twist.

@kim N’s choice has a more precise cut. You don’t see any triangles on her pick.

 

[Klee_Bee]

See the teeny triangles at the base of the arrows? You can also see them on the other enface images. That’s a bit of pavilion twist.

@kim N’s choice has a more precise cut. You don’t see any triangles on her pick.

I didn't know that this aspect had to be considered too! Thank you!

 

[DejaWiz]

@DejaWiz can i also ask you opinion?

I prefer this one in the same price range.

Diamond | 2.91 ct D VS1 Round Cut Precision Lab Grown Diamond IGI Certified | 357043

This fabulous 2.91 carat Round Ideal cut diamond has a clarity grade of VS1 and color grade of D.It is an excellent choice for engagement rings. | 357043

www.whiteflash.com

See the teeny triangles at the base of the arrows? You can also see them on the other enface images. That’s a bit of pavilion twist.

@kim N’s choice has a more precise cut. You don’t see any triangles on her pick.

Exactly this - D VS1 gets you a bit more carat weight and the cut precision looks to be better.
For about the same price, it's a win-win.

 

[Klee_Bee]

Exactly this - D VS1 gets you a bit more carat weight and the cut precision looks to be better.
For about the same price, it's a win-win.

Thank you! I don't know if we will be able to complete the purchase now, but in the future we will ask for your precious help again!

 

[Klee_Bee]

yet another question: the 2.9 one seems to have a yellowish tint despite, for example, the 2.7 one . Could it just be an effect of the photo or is it really yellower despite being a D?

 

[Kim N]

yet another question: the 2.9 one seems to have a yellowish tint despite, for example, the 2.7 one . Could it just be an effect of the photo or is it really yellower despite being a D?

It is very likely the photography. You could ask Whiteflash for a side-by-side photo of the profile view just to be sure.

 

[Klee_Bee]

It is very likely the photography. You could ask Whiteflash for a side-by-side photo of the profile view just to be sure.

Thanks a lot!

 

[Klee_Bee]

comparing the ideal scopes of the 2.9 stone and a random natural ACA, I noticed that in that ACA there seem to be fewer pink areas and it is redder in general. Looking closer I noticed this difference in general between LGDs and ACAs. also comparing the ASETs I noticed that in the ACA ones the green triangles are more precise and well defined
In your opinion, is it possible to find a good LGD stone very similar to ACA?

 

[Klee_Bee]

Sorry if I insist on questions, but I would like to understand if performance can be so really different between a well-cut LGD and a natural ACA

 

[0-0-0]

No difference if they are cut exactly the same. The problem is nothing is cut exactly the same. Even within the same branded lines they are just cut/selected to be as close as possible.

 

[tyty333]

That 2.91 is a precision cut H&A stone with all the right numbers. You've got all the images to show that it's a well cut stone and will
be an excellent performer.

 

[Klee_Bee]

Thank you all!