nimdomin|1308287427|2948137 said:actually, it may be hard for me to see the spot with naked eyes. Maybe you are expert that you can see through it.
proportions means? you mean this diamond size proportion is of big problem?
that indented natural will cause structural issue? easy to crack?
the bottom half is a little too deep at 44%nimdomin|1308287427|2948137 said:actually, it may be hard for me to see the spot with naked eyes. Maybe you are expert that you can see through it.
proportions means? you mean this diamond size proportion is of big problem?
that indented natural will cause structural issue? easy to crack?
you lose some diameter b/c of the depth,most well cut stones are near 43%,plus the girdle is unfinished.nimdomin|1308289370|2948160 said:the bottom half is a little too deep at 44% --- what bad it is? thansk
nimdomin|1308293025|2948173 said:Dancing fire, this diamond is with 6.44-6.47 size. is this acceptable size of 1.01 ct diamond? is it really smaller in diameter due to 44% depth? thanks
nimdomin|1308293666|2948177 said:i feel it is ok good when compared with other similar price stones. maybe i am not expert. cant see the difference. i just worry i see wrong.
nimdomin|1308295918|2948187 said:how about the ideal depth? any referece
if so, this stone is too deep, then why it can be 3EX in GIA....am i being cheated?!