Help choosing between 3 diamonds

[shooter76]

Hello all,
A question from a newbie here. I am looking for a diamond and am considering these three diamonds. I was hoping that I could get some advice from you nice people on which to get. The prices all fall within $60 of each other. I know the pictures aren't the best but it is what I have to go by. Thanks in advance!

Diamond 1
.70
I SI1
Gia Triple Exc
No Fluor
Cloud, Feather
supposedly not eyeclean
59% table
59.8% depth
33 deg crown
40.8deg pavilion
HCA 1.1


Diamond 2
.71
I SI1
Gia Triple Exc
Medium Blue Fluor
Twinning wisp
supposedly eyeclean
58% table
60.7% depth
34.5deg crown
40.6deg pavilion
HCA .8


Diamond 3
.70
I VS2
Gia Triple Exc
Medium Blue Fluor
crystal, cloud, feather
supposedly eyeclean
57%table
60.9% depth
33.5deg crown
40.8 deg pavilion
HCA .9

 

[ecf8503]

#1 is a near 60/60 stone - https://www.pricescope.com/wiki/diamonds/60-60-proportioned-diamond
It will likely have less colored light return than others with more traditionally cut rb proportions. Plus you said it's NOT eye clean - forget about this one.

#2 I like if it's eye clean as you said - I like the crown angle, and the fluor.

#3 Also potentially very nice.

Can you get idealscope images for them?

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

#1 is a near 60/60 stone - https://www.pricescope.com/wiki/diamonds/60-60-proportioned-diamond
It will likely have less colored light return than others with more traditionally cut rb proportions. Plus you said it's NOT eye clean - forget about this one.

#2 I like if it's eye clean as you said - I like the crown angle, and the fluor.

#3 Also potentially very nice.

Can you get idealscope images for them?

I agree ecf

 

[shooter76]

Thanks for the advice! So it sounds like i should lean towards the second or the third. I am not sure if i can get idealscope images on them. I think the crown angle on the second one is a little better and i have read that twinning wisps can be a better inclusion to have and on this one it is the only inclusion listed but the third one is a vs2 and has a slightly better table percentage. I do notice that a inclusion on the vs2 is reflected a few times within. Both the second and third have same star facet lengths of 50, same girdle thickness (med-slightly thick), diameters within .02 of each other, almost the same hca, and no culets. The second one has lower girdles of 75%, the third has 80%. The second has a pavilion depth of 42.5%, third has 43%.