shape
carat
color
clarity

HCA 2.4....Is that OK is the idealscope looks good?

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

costanzaf2

Rough_Rock
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
23
Is very good across the board for HCA gonna sparkle nice? I know excellent is better?

Factor Grade
Light Return Very Good
Fire Very Good
Scintillation Very Good
Spread
or diameter for weight Very Good
Total Visual Performance 2.4 - Very Good - Worth buying if the price is right
Click here to read usage warnings and information.

for a .70 RB G VS2 for approx 2300$
 
Er...not sure what you are asking? If you think the idealscope looks awesome, then sure get it. All diamonds (ok not all all) you get on the market will sparkle some. This diamond will probably reflect light pretty well (but I wouldn''t get it without an idealscope if that''s what you are asking). It may (but without idealscope can''t say for sure) outperform most diamonds you see out on the street.
 
Date: 5/23/2007 11:55:13 PM
Author:costanzaf2
Is very good across the board for HCA gonna sparkle nice? I know excellent is better?

Factor Grade
Light Return Very Good
Fire Very Good
Scintillation Very Good
Spread
or diameter for weight Very Good
Total Visual Performance 2.4 - Very Good - Worth buying if the price is right
Click here to read usage warnings and information.

for a .70 RB G VS2 for approx 2300$
A score of under 2 on the HCA is normally considered cherry, but if the HCA predicts a score of 2.4, chances are it is an attractive diamond.
 
Out of curiosity, what are the numbers?
 
Costanza,

You develop threads that kinda friz out.

I take this one your talking about is this one from the end of this thread.

Right?

You''ve got a bunch of nice options...but I think this one may be the best. As I said in the earlier note...it may be getting an IS (did you ask for one) would be instructive or not, based on your having 2 eyes, vs, one.

Regards,
 
Ira, I don''t think the one you linked is it, at least it doesn''t appear to be. He''s now asking about a .70 G VS2, which is different from your link.
 
Ellen,

Right you are.

On the search by cut site, I''m still seeing this one I saw before as at least an attractive option for $2290 wire price...but, as an SI1 (and an F), he''d still want to ask about it.
 
Costanza,

I interested in...but I think the answer is yes to your thread title...

The pattern from the selection you''re looking at is interesting. The second thread discussed the binocular thing...but doesn''t itself talk about it''s application in the IS. The first, though most on point...generated a lot of noise...but read the last 6 posts, starting from Belle''s comments.
 
Can you post the numbers and the ideal scope images? Hard to say with just a 2.4 number...
 
Date: 5/24/2007 1:40:00 PM
Author: kcoursolle
Can you post the numbers and the ideal scope images? Hard to say with just a 2.4 number...
I''m guessing this is the one.
 
Date: 5/24/2007 2:00:12 PM
Author: Regular Guy

Date: 5/24/2007 1:40:00 PM
Author: kcoursolle
Can you post the numbers and the ideal scope images? Hard to say with just a 2.4 number...
I''m guessing this is the one.
If that''s the case...not bad, but there are better stones out there. I don''t love diamonds with depth over 62% personally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top