- Joined
- Mar 28, 2001
- Messages
- 6,341
Date: 7/28/2009 2:08:48 PM
Author: ChunkyCushionLover
Date: 7/28/2009 4:07:00 AM
Author: arjunajane
Date: 7/28/2009 3:37:33 AM
Author: ChunkyCushionLover
Date: 7/27/2009 9:34:53 PM
Author: diamondtiger
Is 1.07 CT going to be big enough? Her ring size is 4.5 and I want to be sure that it doesn''t look small. I know that''s probably a question is relative to each individual but your input/experience is appreciated.
Diamondtiger,
I struggle with the same issue here https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/the-shocking-final-diamond-choice-i-gave-to-my-fiance-which-one-would-you-pick.121154/.
A 1 carat diamond is still much larger than the average stone sold in North America and on a small finger is just fine.
However if you ask most women they are going to like bigger and these OMCs definitely look smaller than a round for the same carat weight.
I should point out that I felt that in only a 1 carat it is more difficult except up close to see how wonderful the facet pattern is on these stones.
Its easy to see in a blowup video or picture but in real life its a little more difficult. You should see it in real life for yourself.
But the question you have to ask yourself is are you willing to pay a lot more or go down in color to get bigger? The cut is not making the diamond look appreciably smaller.
Hey CCL,
I can''t speak for everyone that owns one of these new OMC''s, but I do have to say I disagree with some parts of your post based on my own experience.
My 1ct OMC on the hand I can easily see/appreciate the facet pattern both up close and
from arm''s distance.
Also, having owned a round ideal cut, I was also surprised for a fancy just how decent the face up size/spread was. I''m not saying it will look exactly the same as a H&A round of same weight, but I doubt there is much in it..
I can understand though in your case, going from only viewing photos/videos to seeing the real thing in real life, how you might get that impression about the ''small'' facets/size.
But this will be the case with any diamond shape you choose - after all they are very tiny things in real life!
I agree totally with what you said. After all as a proportion to the total size of the stone those mirrors under the tables are as big as any facet you will see in any brilliant cut diamond! However when looking at the blowups of your ring I was expecting something more dramatic in real life that would make this 1ct stone look bigger that didn''t really happen.
I gave you an actual size difference between your round and your OMC about 25% less but the square shape does psychologically make it look bigger which is a good thing. It is an unfair comparison to compare OMCs to Rounds they are 15 - 35% cheaper for the same carat weight.
Diamondtiger,Date: 7/28/2009 10:00:20 PM
Author: diamondtiger
I see exactly what you mean. It''s hard to tell from the pics but how noticeable is the halo? I really like the diamond that I''ve picked out but I just want to make sure it''s big enough. There''s a 1.63 carat that I can get but the color is L. I''ve read that this difference in color will be noticeable with the halo and diamonds on the band.
Date: 7/28/2009 10:00:20 PM
Author: diamondtiger
I see exactly what you mean. It''s hard to tell from the pics but how noticeable is the halo? I really like the diamond that I''ve picked out but I just want to make sure it''s big enough. There''s a 1.63 carat that I can get but the color is L. I''ve read that this difference in color will be noticeable with the halo and diamonds on the band.
If I were you, I would get her the setting that she wants. The stone is up to you and what you feel comfortable with. I''m sure both are gorgeous! 4.5 is a small finger and the setting will make it look bigger. Don''t worry!
Ok, I''m not an expert on cushions and from your posts above it seems that your girlfriend perfers the more square proportioned stones so I''d stick with what you have. My alternate choice would be the H but that is based on personal preference.
Ditto. If she has always loved this setting, I have a feeling she may be very disappointed if you give her something else. And in my opinion, smaller melee just gives a more "delicate" look, not cheap.Date: 7/29/2009 8:11:11 AM
Author: emeraldlover1
If I were you, I would get her the setting that she wants. The stone is up to you and what you feel comfortable with. I'm sure both are gorgeous! 4.5 is a small finger and the setting will make it look bigger. Don't worry!
Date: 7/29/2009 2:06:50 PM
Author: emeraldlover1
I agree looking at them in person is a good idea but he is trying to surprise her. She said that''s what she wants.
Ditto. Go with the G in the Tacori.Date: 7/29/2009 5:41:31 PM
Author: emeraldlover1
I think you have your answer then!![]()
GOG being a Tacori dealer can send the diamond to Tacori directly and receive it from them when its done. That is what I mean by being insured all the way and having them set the ring.Date: 7/29/2009 2:06:50 PM
Author: emeraldlover1
CCL...
Tacori uses G mele and they do not gaurentee their setting if someone else sets the stone. The turn around time for Tacori is about the same as the other designers. The rings are also custom made to fit the size of the center stone so I wouldn''t worry about that.
I agree looking at them in person is a good idea but he is trying to surprise her. She said that''s what she wants.
Yay! You have surely done due diligence here dt.Date: 7/29/2009 6:35:08 PM
Author: diamondtiger
So I did some more asking today and her 2 favorite shapes are cushion and round. She actually said that cushion is her favorite because it is ''unique.'' For round, she commented that a lot of people have round. I asked what she would think if she it were a round and her response was ''I wouldn''t be disappointed.'' I laughed and asked ''Why?'' Her reasoning was that they are look great but a lot of people have them.
Needless to say, I think I''m ready to place my order with GOG!
Date: 7/29/2009 8:09:52 PM
Author: Ellen
I don''t think you can do a cushion with that?