Hi,
I have been fooling around with the GIA facetware available on their website. In playing with some diamonds posted on pricescope vendor websites it seems that more than a few of what I thought would be considered "super ideals" would fall into GIA''s "very good" category instead of excellent. I did not have the star and lower half percents of course from the available information, but trying many combinations of those still led to a "very good" classification. Am I missing something or doing something incorrectly or is the GIA "excellent" for cut somehow not in congruence with the current "super ideals"?
Thanks for any insights.
Joe H
I have been fooling around with the GIA facetware available on their website. In playing with some diamonds posted on pricescope vendor websites it seems that more than a few of what I thought would be considered "super ideals" would fall into GIA''s "very good" category instead of excellent. I did not have the star and lower half percents of course from the available information, but trying many combinations of those still led to a "very good" classification. Am I missing something or doing something incorrectly or is the GIA "excellent" for cut somehow not in congruence with the current "super ideals"?
Thanks for any insights.
Joe H