Date: 9/20/2007 2:07:18 AM
Author: sparkles
Okay..I just read that the depth should be a smidge just under 60. So what table and angles combinations will I looking be looking at then please?
Am I assuming that this would still score well on the HCA. I guess not.
Want 9.5 to 9.8 out of 10 look at the aca line from them.Date: 9/20/2007 12:54:56 PM
Author: sparkles
7.5 out of 10 for the $$$ hubby is spending is not going to cut it
Date: 9/20/2007 1:46:05 PM
Author: FireGoddess
WHFSR - if Sparkles is trading in her pear, then her tradeup policy is with WF, hence the not looking at other vendors.
Date: 9/20/2007 6:40:53 PM
Author: Ellen
With all due respect to all involved, my only question is this. Why doesn't this IS look like Harriet's, which is the same size as sparkles? If it's truly a size issue, can they redo it, or is some of it actually the cut?
Harriet's stone.
Right on DSDate: 9/20/2007 7:52:13 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
I have a feeling that if you put that one side by side with an ACA, most of us would not be able to tell which was which. We all get so hooked on perfection, that we might be dismissing a perfectly wonderful stone! My big question would be, is this stone subject to the trade-in policy? If not, I wouldn''t consider it.
Date: 9/20/2007 6:32:32 PM
Author: sparkles
FireGoddess the nail on the head.
Workingforsmallrewards, sounds like you think I should pass on this diamond!