... And I don't mean the fruit!
Hi, all- I'm brand new here at the suggestion of a friend who found this website informative.
I'm looking to buy my girlfriend an engagement ring, and I've been shopping online for stones (I'm far removed from a metro area that would provide immediate variety in person). It will be a "simple" ring: a diamond pear-shape solitaire, likely in a cathedral style setting.
My research online has suggested the following for a "good" pear:
- L/W Ratio: 1.5-1.6
- Table: 53-62%
- Depth: 56-66%
- Girdle: Very thin to slightly thick
- Culet: None
- Color: F or better
- Florescence: None
- Clarity: VS2 or better
- Polish: Excellent
I've been eyeing stones between 1.00-1.05 carats, and I've come up with the following that fit my criteria (I'd prefer to stay around $6500); all are Fs, with otherwise nearly identical features beside clarity:
VS1, $6067: http://www.bluenile.com/diamond-details/LD06165843
VVS2, $6240: http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/pear-shaped/1.00-carat-f-color-vvs2-clarity-sku-647515
VVS1, $6645: http://www.bluenile.com/diamond-details/LD05167971
Is any stone above notably "better" than the others? Or, am I unnecessarily placing too much emphasis on clarity, thus overpaying for something unimportant? I can tell the difference between clarity when in a store with a loupe or microscope, but I haven't seen enough diamonds in my time to know the real life importance of clarity (heck, or ANY of the features above!)... The most important thing to my future fiance will be "sparkle", I imagine.
With all that being said, there's one more stone I noticed that seems like a heck of a "deal" (though it's a bit of an outlier to the criteria above): http://www.bluenile.com/diamond-details/LD06288825 <-- This stone is 1.21 Carats, E color, VS2... if you folks tell me that I'm placing too much emphasis on clarity with the stones above, and this stone gets your collective blessing, I may opt to spring for this biggun!
Thanks to all in advance for both your time and assistance!
Jared
Hi, all- I'm brand new here at the suggestion of a friend who found this website informative.
I'm looking to buy my girlfriend an engagement ring, and I've been shopping online for stones (I'm far removed from a metro area that would provide immediate variety in person). It will be a "simple" ring: a diamond pear-shape solitaire, likely in a cathedral style setting.
My research online has suggested the following for a "good" pear:
- L/W Ratio: 1.5-1.6
- Table: 53-62%
- Depth: 56-66%
- Girdle: Very thin to slightly thick
- Culet: None
- Color: F or better
- Florescence: None
- Clarity: VS2 or better
- Polish: Excellent
I've been eyeing stones between 1.00-1.05 carats, and I've come up with the following that fit my criteria (I'd prefer to stay around $6500); all are Fs, with otherwise nearly identical features beside clarity:
VS1, $6067: http://www.bluenile.com/diamond-details/LD06165843
VVS2, $6240: http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/pear-shaped/1.00-carat-f-color-vvs2-clarity-sku-647515
VVS1, $6645: http://www.bluenile.com/diamond-details/LD05167971
Is any stone above notably "better" than the others? Or, am I unnecessarily placing too much emphasis on clarity, thus overpaying for something unimportant? I can tell the difference between clarity when in a store with a loupe or microscope, but I haven't seen enough diamonds in my time to know the real life importance of clarity (heck, or ANY of the features above!)... The most important thing to my future fiance will be "sparkle", I imagine.
With all that being said, there's one more stone I noticed that seems like a heck of a "deal" (though it's a bit of an outlier to the criteria above): http://www.bluenile.com/diamond-details/LD06288825 <-- This stone is 1.21 Carats, E color, VS2... if you folks tell me that I'm placing too much emphasis on clarity with the stones above, and this stone gets your collective blessing, I may opt to spring for this biggun!
Thanks to all in advance for both your time and assistance!
Jared