shape
carat
color
clarity

First time buyer, any advice on this stone?

georgesmith35

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
21
HI, first time loose diamond buyer (and poster) for an engagement ring. I am considering a particular diamond presented by an independent jeweler who is trusted friend of a family member. The diamond is:
GIA certified
1.02 carat brilliant round 57 facet, 6.17 by 6.23 (not sure of depth)
Si1 (one small dot inclusion, not visible with the eye)
D
Polish good
Symmetry good
Strong fluorescence
Cut fair
(I think table is 60%, depth 57%)
$5075 out the door
My concerns are about the luminescence and the cut. It seems highly debated, is it REALLY an issue having strong fluorescence in a colorless (D) diamond? I know the cut is very important and would like a higher grade, but the reality is this is the top of my budget. Does this stone seem like a good choice and a fair/good value? Am I reasonably going to do better for a $5k budget? The stone appears very clear and bright (visually and 10x under normal lighting) but of course im no expert!! Any advice is appreciated, thanks.
 

stone-cold11

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
14,083
From the depth, probably too shallow, probably have obstruction issue. Other factors such as only a Good grade in symm and polish suggest bad workmanship or an old round cut.

Not sure how reliable GIS is in terms of color and clarity grading, can be way off for all we know. So I will compare it with EGL graded stones, which is also known to be unreliable and as such discounted by the trade. Not really a deal from what I can see.

https://www.pricescope.com/diamond-...on=&type_search=1&all=all&h_GIA=off&h_AGS=off
 

georgesmith35

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
21
I had a typo, it is GIA certified! Thanks
 

stone-cold11

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
14,083
Post the GIA report number?

Fair cut is almost the lowest grade GIA can give.

For a 1.0c stone, with that low a total height and that large a table, it only has the diameter of a 0.85-0.9c stone, something is horribly wrong with the angles to get to that stage. I would drop the carat weight to a 0.9c stone. It will probably look better, appears bigger.


. well-cut-vs-poor-cut-diamond.jpg

The stone on the right is a 1 carat stone, compare to a left which is a 0.84c stone, which look better, bigger? They both have the same diameter.

From the knowledge section.
http://www.pricescope.com/wiki/diamonds/diamond-carat-weight/
 

slg47

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
9,667
I think you can find a better stone for your budget. if you post your preferred specs we can find some suitable online candidates. I would not go with a 'fair' cut...the cut will determine how much the diamond sparkles. also that stone is measuring small for its carat weight, so you could get a smaller well cut stone that will be the same size.
 

bridecat

Rough_Rock
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
28
The reasonable price for a GIA 1 carat stone is definitely because of the FAIR cut. That is very very low...as the other poster said, lowest GIA gives.

I would always sacrifice a bit of carat for better cut and maybe even clarity. If you dip below the carat "magic size" you can usually get more bang for your buck.

Good luck!
 

georgesmith35

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
21
Hi, thanks for the feedback, I am concerned about the fair cut (GIA does have a 'poor' grade). I do have additional info and am curious how far from 'ideal' this stone is. I have read the ideal numbers, and this is not ideal.... what kind of loss of brillinace would one expect with this cut? signifigant visual brilance loss? I DO want quality over absolute size, it seems maybe I should be looking in the under 1 carat size with good or VG cut, possibly with lower color, not sure if dropping to Si2 would be wise for G or VG cut? Thanks for the advice. Its a signifigant purchase and I know im over my head experiencewise here.
.
6.17 by 6.23 by 4.16 again its 1.02 carat brillinat round 57 facet
depth 67% D color
table 60% Si1
crown angle 38 polish good
crown height 15.5% symmetry good
pavillion angle 42.6 cut FAIR
pavillion depth 46% flourescence STRONG
star length 55%
lower half 85%
girtle slightly thick to thick faceted
 

slg47

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
9,667
ok those numbers look...terrible. 67 is way too deep, the crown is very steep, the pavilion is deep...

the cut of the stone will determine how 'sparkly' it is. you want to get a well cut stone so that it reflects light back to your eye. as mentioned previously, this stone may WEIGH 1 carat but the diameter is much smaller than what a 1 carat stone should be.


ETA this one is 0.91 ct but is actually larger in diameter than the one you posted.
http://goodoldgold.com/diamond/8427/

this one is 5500 wire price
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamond/diamond-detail/?product_id=BLAGS-104052029001

another one
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/H-SI1-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1389978.asp
 

yssie

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
27,242
:-o

ditto - it's a trainwreck. Would love to see some pics though, and an IS - that'd be one for the books!


I really think you need to find a new jeweller - this trusted family friend is not looking to do you any favours, obviously.


ETA - You can play with this tool - https://www.pricescope.com/tools/hca

Threads/articles/webpages you may be interested in re. importance of cut -
[URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/freaking-out-hca-came-back-as-fair.130388/page-2']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/freaking-out-hca-came-back-as-fair.130388/page-2[/URL]
http://www.goodoldgold.com/articles/giaexconsumersbeaware/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/206/badcutvsgoodcut.jpg/ (AGS ideal vs steep GIA VG)
 

slg47

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
9,667
Yssie|1309320292|2957666 said:
:-o

ditto - it's a trainwreck. Would love to see some pics though, and an IS - that'd be one for the books!


I really think you need to find a new jeweller - this trusted family friend is not looking to do you any favours, obviously.

yes I would definitely be interested to see pictures and an idealscope image!!! or a GOG comparison video... I have no idea what a stone of those proportions would look like.

have you seen it in person? if so I would strongly urge you to look at some ideal cut stones in person (in different lighting, everything sparkles in the jewelry store lighting) and see what you see.
 

Dancing Fire

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
33,852
georgesmith35|1309319067|2957640 said:
Hi, thanks for the feedback, I am concerned about the fair cut (GIA does have a 'poor' grade). I do have additional info and am curious how far from 'ideal' this stone is. I have read the ideal numbers, and this is not ideal.... what kind of loss of brillinace would one expect with this cut? signifigant visual brilance loss? I DO want quality over absolute size, it seems maybe I should be looking in the under 1 carat size with good or VG cut, possibly with lower color, not sure if dropping to Si2 would be wise for G or VG cut? Thanks for the advice. Its a signifigant purchase and I know im over my head experiencewise here.
.
6.17 by 6.23 by 4.16 again its 1.02 carat brillinat round 57 facet
depth 67% D color
table 60% Si1
crown angle 38 polish good
crown height 15.5% symmetry good
pavillion angle 42.6
cut FAIR
pavillion depth 46% flourescence STRONG
star length 55%
lower half 85%
girtle slightly thick to thick faceted

flush this one down the toilet!! .. :knockout: :knockout:
 

Dancing Fire

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
33,852
georgesmith35|1309220976|2956639 said:
HI, first time loose diamond buyer (and poster) for an engagement ring. I am considering a particular diamond presented by an independent jeweler who is trusted friend of a family member.

rule #1-Never buy diamond from a friend of the family.
 

georgesmith35

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
21
I am digesting the feedback and will almost surely pass on this stone....
 

tyty333

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 17, 2008
Messages
27,198
Please do pass...the cut is the most important part of the stone. Please dont sacrifice the cut to get to the 1 carat mark.
A well cut .9 stone will look so much more beautiful than a badly cut 1 carat.
 

georgesmith35

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
21
I am looking for a .90-1.1 brillinat round ideal to vg cut, D-F, VVG2 to Si1. $5k is my budget for stone.
 

yssie

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
27,242
Going to have to compromise a bit, looks like -

0.91 E SI1 $4.9k http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-SI1-Premium-Cut-Round-Diamond-1353578.asp
Thick girdle hiding some weight, but otherwise well-proportioned. In a stone of this size even a thick girdle should not be unsightly. Request IS if interested.

0.9 E SI1 $5.4k http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-SI1-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1192351.asp
looks like a nice one, request IS. 2008 report so you'll want to plan for appraisal of loose stone to confirm that report indicates current condition of the stone

0.91 G SI1 $5.4k http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/G-SI1-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1370955.asp
again looks fine, request IS
 

diamondseeker2006

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
58,547
The original stone you posted faced up like a .90 stone anyway, so there was no reason to buy it. A well cut 1 ct. stone will be around 6.5mm. Always look at the diameter. As the others have said, a well cut .90 ct. stone is by far better than a lesser cut 1 ct. stone.
 

Christina...

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
5,028
I think that you could really give up some color to get your cut up too. You really shouldn't pay the premium for a D color if you need to sacrifice cut to do so.

Also a GIA 'good' cut just isn't going to do it for you either. In this case 'good' isn't good enough. You really want to be looking at an excellent cut stone if you want it to perform really well and at the very least a 'very good' cut if the IS and ASET come back looking ok.

A .85 or a .90 isn't going to look that much smaller than a 1ct, assuming that they are all well cut and not sitting side by side.
 

georgesmith35

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
21
Thank you all for this input, this is a very large purchase for my budget and a I CANNOT judge a diamond with my eye, for the most part they all look 'brilliant'. The feedback I have received has helped me not make a mistake, thanks for your input, I cannot say how much it means
 

georgesmith35

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
21
I have changed my search to GIA excellent cut, EX symmetry, EX polish, VS2 or better. This puts me in .70-.85 carat range at my budget ($4500-5500). Is there a point where the size starts to look 'small'? Is .70-.75 compromising TOO much for quality over size? I know its subjective, but if I can get an idea, roughly what is the smallest size I should be looking at it would help. I could probibly swing a 'hearts and arrows', but it would be around .70-.75.. Are these worth the extra money? Is a GIA EX cut, EX symmetry, EX polish, no flourescence comporable to 'hearts and diamonds'? Or are these truly unique and it shows? They look georgous, but how much will the eye tell? I could get more carat just looking for GIA EX, EX, EX... Thanks for all the help. George
 

centralsquare

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
2,216
Have you looked at diamonds below D color? You can probably drop one - two grades and barely notice a difference. I have an H color and it's pretty white. Dropping a bit in color will allow you to get a better cut, which will have a greater impact on the beauty of the diamond.
 

slg47

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
9,667
you are probably OK with SI1 (check with vendor if eye-clean) especially since your initial post was SI1. as far as H&A I don't think you 'need' it but many of the branded H&A diamonds come with better upgrade/buyback policies so that is something to consider if it is important to you. I would look for a non-H&A GIA Ex (use HCA score to find good options) or AGS0 diamond...the ones posted earlier in this thread are probably a good place to start
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top