NoonersMom
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2004
- Messages
- 353
***********
"Feminism is the radical notion that women are people"
Remind me to scan in my photos of marching with NOW on Washington in ''95.....Blueroses takes it to the Capitol, yo
What an emotionally charged issue this is! Our generation is still in such flux with reconciling the you-can-do-it-all 80s and our current new-con times!
I think it''s all about each couple''s preference. While I may indeed change my name, one thing worthy of note for me is that I''m VERY adamant about middle names having a family connection, and that at least the first or middle name for each child should be from the mom''s side. (My sister and I each have one of our grandmother''s maiden names as our middle names)...and that''s just MY choice--my way of trying to keep something matrilineal (sp?) going even if I do change my last name.
But I agree with some previous posters. It''s about being John and Mary Smith vs. Mr. and Mrs. John Smith, or worse "the John Smiths"!!!! My bf is a III. I''m not entirely thrilled with the prospect of having the exact same married name as my MIL or her late MIL (bf''s grandmother), with the rare exception of formally addressed wedding invitations!!
Anyway, I''ll shut up now. I guess I''m still on the fence about what I''ll do professionally, but I''m pretty sure I will change it "in life".
eta: I lied about the shutting up Had to add that I disagree re: feminism having nothing to do with the name choice--at least historically and culturally, though perhaps not on an individual level. I mean--a woman''s reasons for changing or not changing her name probably have to do with her personal beliefs about family or her own professional life, and it''s entirely possible that she hasn''t given any big "personal is political" thought to it. But historically, it has everything to do with feminism and the rise of women''s equality--this would not have been much of an issue in the past--it just wouldn''t have happened, because names have been handed down through the father''s line, and not the mother''s. I''m sure a lot of us don''t give it that kind of thought, but consider whether our grandmothers would have been having this conversation.....and what''s happened to women in the world in the intervening 60-80 years since they were married.....it might seem totally unrelated on the surface, but that''s the luxury we have as the recipients of what our moms and grandmother''s and so on fought for! 100 years ago, we couldn''t even VOTE--we forget how quickly our world has changed, and what a priviledge it is for us to even have a choice in this matter!
Ok, I will step off my soapbox--this isn''t really directed at anyone at all, so I hope no offense is taken, I just got off on a tangent. I mean, I was reading "The Feminine Mystique" for pleasure reading in college, so I guess my protesting muscles were a bit rusty Women who choose to take their husband''s name and stay home are making just as valid a choice--my Smith collge alum-fulbright-winning sister is now a stay-at-home-mommy, and i have the utmost respect for her!!! But we have to remember that that choice didn''t use to even exist.
It makes me so sad that there are women at ALL that don''t consider themselves feminist--all that word means is one who believes that women should be treated equally and afforded equal rights. That''s it! I didn''t have to buy combat boots or grow my pits or cut my hair or burn my bra or anything! (Well, I did get the free toaster....)
*************
Thoughts ladies (and gentlemen)?