Christina...
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 5,028
Dreamer_D|1377015794|3506632 said:OP I would like to present another opinion.
When selecting a diamond, there are various standards you can use to judge its cut. One is the lab report, and in this case GIA gave the diamond an Ex cut grade. Another is a tool like the HCA, which was designed by one of the owners of PS and is a great tool in many ways but it is not used widely in the diamond world. Another is your eyes. Another is imaging tech like an ideal scope or a microscope. All of these tools help you to exclude diamonds not worth considering further. Some also let you actually *select* diamonds, like the lab report. In all cases, though, the choice is yours as a consumer how narrowly you want to define "well cut". Selecting a GI Ex cut already means you have narrowed the pool considerably. You can narrow the pool further using tools like the HCA, which would exclude your current diamond from consideration. Or, you can choose NOT to narrow the pool any more and stick with what you have. The choice is YOURS and I do not think there is a decidedly wrong choice given that you already selected a GIA Ex cut and that you paid a fair price for the diamond and mount. Think about it and think about what you are after.
If you consider a replacement, be sure to compare it to your present stone and examine it with your eyes before you opt to switch! Actually, better yet, take your ring to Jared and compare it to an AGS0 cut stone (don't worry about color and clarity since those are not at issue). Can you see a difference? No? Stick with what you have. Yes? Pursue a switch.
AprilBaby|1377015094|3506616 said:AGS is stricter than GIA
On cut, yes. There is some talk on the boards about AGS being slightly less strict on color but there is no hard proof of this.
THIS^^^
I'm really happy that Dreamer responded. I read your response in the car on my way home and I felt horrible that you were feeling overwhelmed and confused. I also wanted to tell you, as Dreamer already did, that any GIA Ex cut stone is going to be very pretty...better cut than the majority of stones being sold to consumers today.
My intent in showing you the AGS stones was in hopes that it would remove some of the guess work for you. GIA doesn't grade cut, AGS does, my thinking being that my narrowing your choices to a few that had already been evaluated for light performance, would take away some of the guess work and inspire a bit of confidence that a well respected lab had already assessed the stone as having wonderful light performance. Unfortunately I confused you even more.
If you have already contacted the vendor and asked them to show you the AGS stone, then I would do just as Dreamer suggested and compare it side by side with the stone that you've already chosen. View it in a variety of light environments, in the office if they will allow you, and outside as well if that is possible and see if one speaks to you more than the other. If you can't see a difference, then stick with the stone you already have, you chose above all others once, and you are in the best position to determine it's beauty...the eyes trump all. I hope that helps bring things into better perspective.