Does this idealscope image look leaky?

[Mlh]

Scores great on hca. 34.5 cr 40.8 pav, 56 table, 61.9 depth, 3.5 lgf.

 

[headlight]

Looks like tiny amt of leakage (if not from poor photog set up). I don’t think it will translate into a performance issue you will see, but if you aren’t comfortable then you aren’t comfortable. How does the stone look in actual views? What did you mean by 3.5 lower girdle facet?

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

No - it is just slightly off axis. JA have a little too much back light. They are working on reducing it a bit as a result of some of our discussions here.

 

[Mlh]

Looks like tiny amt of leakage (if not from poor photog set up). I don’t think it will translate into a performance issue you will see, but if you aren’t comfortable then you aren’t comfortable. How does the stone look in actual views? What did you mean by 3.5 lower girdle facet?

Oops 80 lgf. 3.5 girdle. Typed too fast. Good catch @headlight !

 

[Mlh]

No - it is just slightly off axis. JA have a little too much back light. They are working on reducing it a bit as a result of some of our discussions here.

Thank you @Garry H (Cut Nut) !

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

Thank you @Garry H (Cut Nut) !

Put a hold on it. It will be nice