Hi Everyone:
When I first compared the two asschers, both 1.05ct, one is FSI1 and the other HVS1, I thought I definitely like the FSI1 better. It seemed to have more fire and brighter. However, now that I have more time to look at it at different light conditions, I am not so sure anymore. Here are couple of photos for you to look at. The FSI1, while sometimes brighter, seems to have a step missing, if that make sense. While with the HVS1, you can see more steps. My daughter and friends prefer the FSI1 because of it being brighter, but my husband likes the HVS1 because you can see more of the steps. I, on the other hand, cannot decide which one I like better. I like the FSI1 because it is sometimes brighter, but I like the HVS1 better sometimes because I can see the more defined steps in it. Can you see the difference? The FSI1 is in a ring holder.
The FSI1 is on the left below
The FSI1 is on the right below
Does the FSI1 has a "dead step"?
When I first compared the two asschers, both 1.05ct, one is FSI1 and the other HVS1, I thought I definitely like the FSI1 better. It seemed to have more fire and brighter. However, now that I have more time to look at it at different light conditions, I am not so sure anymore. Here are couple of photos for you to look at. The FSI1, while sometimes brighter, seems to have a step missing, if that make sense. While with the HVS1, you can see more steps. My daughter and friends prefer the FSI1 because of it being brighter, but my husband likes the HVS1 because you can see more of the steps. I, on the other hand, cannot decide which one I like better. I like the FSI1 because it is sometimes brighter, but I like the HVS1 better sometimes because I can see the more defined steps in it. Can you see the difference? The FSI1 is in a ring holder.
The FSI1 is on the left below
The FSI1 is on the right below
Does the FSI1 has a "dead step"?