depth question

[barryb]

Greetings:

First time post here and I have a quick question about depth...

Based on this limited info:

1.43 carat
Depth 62.9
Table 57
Med Girdle
7.13-7.19x4.46

Can anyone out there tell me if it seems to be cut a little too deep? Sorry if the answer is obvious... I am looking to make a purchase and was completely oblivious to all the finer points of diamonds that I should know when making an informed purchase... THANKS IN ADVANCE!!

-B

sorry, let me add that this is a round cut, if that helps. i have not viewed the sarin report although it is availabe if need be... any help/insight would be much appreciated!

btw, symmetry is GIA excellent.

 

[WinkHPD]

It looks a tad deep, but could still be an incredible diamond. Did you happen to get the crown and pavilion angles?

Wink

 

[moolman]

As a reference, I just bought a 1.32 and the size was 7.12-7.14 so that diamond is small looking for it''s size.

 

[barryb]

ah, thanks for the comparison. probably be passing on this one as i suspected the same. too bad though, havent come across too many vvs1/E ''s so far...

thanks again,
b

 

[moolman]

Most people here say that if it looks good buy it regardless of the proportions.

 

[Dancing Fire]

Date: 3/19/2005 12:29

5 AM
Author: moolman
Most people here say that if it looks good buy it regardless of the proportions.

to some people all diamond looks good ,even (ugly cut) mall stones.

 

[barryb]

so true... that''s the hard part. knowing im paying for a diamond that looks smaller than it is hard to take mentally... even though it''s beautiful.