leeklight1
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2012
- Messages
- 8
Hi all,
I got some great help on this forum earlier in the month looking at a couple of stones and picking out what seemed like the best one - all from BGD.
The one that was picked out was a 1.014 H SI1 stone:
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/1.014-h-si1-round-diamond-ags-104052883011
However, this week BGD released a new batch of stones - with some seeming a bit cheaper price wise - and I'm now seriously considering this one for about $400 less:
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/1.006-h-si1-round-diamond-ags-104061000022
Could any of you lend your experience as to whether I have any reason to consider the first one despite the higher price?
If both are eye-clean, I'm just not sure if the inclusions on the 2nd are worse in any way or even if the measurements between both vary in any noticeable way. I did run the numbers through the HCA and the 1st came out to 1.2 and the 2nd came out to 1.5.
Thanks in advance for the help!
I got some great help on this forum earlier in the month looking at a couple of stones and picking out what seemed like the best one - all from BGD.
The one that was picked out was a 1.014 H SI1 stone:
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/1.014-h-si1-round-diamond-ags-104052883011
However, this week BGD released a new batch of stones - with some seeming a bit cheaper price wise - and I'm now seriously considering this one for about $400 less:
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/1.006-h-si1-round-diamond-ags-104061000022
Could any of you lend your experience as to whether I have any reason to consider the first one despite the higher price?
If both are eye-clean, I'm just not sure if the inclusions on the 2nd are worse in any way or even if the measurements between both vary in any noticeable way. I did run the numbers through the HCA and the 1st came out to 1.2 and the 2nd came out to 1.5.
Thanks in advance for the help!