Compare these cut properties

[lojack_ii]

With the help of this forum and some other readings I have narrowed the search down to about 4 diamonds. Instead of posting everything about each, I''m just going to post the MEASUREMENTS, DEPTH, TABLE, CROWN & PAVILION ANGLE, and HCA SCORE. The other stats are comparable among them all. They are all round diamonds.

DIAMOND #1:

Size = 1.06 ct (6.58 x 6.64 x 4.00)
Depth = 60.5
Table = 57
Crown Angle = 33.5
Pavilion Angle = 41
HCA = 1.0 (EX in all, except VG spread)


DIAMOND #2:

Size = 1.00 ct (6.46 x 6.51 x 3.94)
Depth = 60.8%
Table = 58%
Crown Angle = 34.5
Pavilion Angle = 40.6
HCA = 0.6 (EX in all, except VG in spread)


DIAMOND #3:

Size = 1.08 (6.57 x 6.60 x 4.07)
Depth = 61.8
Table = 55
Crown Angle = 33.5
Pavilion Angle = 41
HCA = 1.1 (Ex in all, except VG in spread)
*Note = H-color w/Medium Blue fluorescence

 

[lojack_ii]

No cut experts reading tonight??

 

[JulieN]

what do you want people to say?

they are all potentially nice diamonds.

 

[lojack_ii]

Date: 11/8/2006 11:55:47 PM
Author: JulieN
what do you want people to say?


they are all potentially nice diamonds.

Usually when someone posts a couple of diamonds and says "compare these", it means "opinions welcome". I have concerns about the proportions of a couple of those, so I''m waiting to see if anyone who knows cuts well will mention anything negative about them.

If you don''t have anything to add, you don''t need to respond.

 

[JulieN]

it''s a bit like walking into a restaurant and asking for food.

do you want theoretical opinions about appearance or do you want someone to pick the one that you should buy?