Hi all,
Long time reader, first time poster I've learned a lot from you guys as I've prepared to buy a engagement ring.
So, after much lamenting and deliberating, I've narrowed it down (at least for the time being - still open to considerations) to two candidate diamonds. Here are the specs:
Diamond 1: GIA, 1.51 carat, SI2, G, EX/EX/VG (polish is VG); seems to be a great cut but slightly imperfect "hearts and arrows," scores a 1.8 on the HCA; priced at $10.5k. Certificate: http://bit.ly/ldBiOv
Diamond 2: GIA, 1.40 carat, SI1, G, EX/EX/EX, "hearts and arrows," scores a 5.0 on the HCA ; priced at $11.5k. Certificate: http://bit.ly/mkvU3K
If I stick my nose up to the SI2, I can see inclusions right underneath the girdle and maybe one under the table, but I can't see anything on the SI1. I have seen both of these stones in person, albeit only in the jewelry store, and both look GREAT to me (an admittedly untrained eye). I repeatedly asked the jeweler to do blind tests, and probably 4/5 times I chose Diamond #1 (the 1.51 ct SI2). I did blind tests on the jeweler, and she always picked Diamond #2 (the 1.40 ct SI1).
My gut is telling me to go with the 1.51, but I'm conflicted because it's an SI2 and if I really try, I can see some inclusions. The SI1 is definitely "eye clean" and has the H&A designation going for it, but it's more expensive and smaller.
Anyone here have a preference or can offer some momentum to push me off the fence?
Long time reader, first time poster I've learned a lot from you guys as I've prepared to buy a engagement ring.
So, after much lamenting and deliberating, I've narrowed it down (at least for the time being - still open to considerations) to two candidate diamonds. Here are the specs:
Diamond 1: GIA, 1.51 carat, SI2, G, EX/EX/VG (polish is VG); seems to be a great cut but slightly imperfect "hearts and arrows," scores a 1.8 on the HCA; priced at $10.5k. Certificate: http://bit.ly/ldBiOv
Diamond 2: GIA, 1.40 carat, SI1, G, EX/EX/EX, "hearts and arrows," scores a 5.0 on the HCA ; priced at $11.5k. Certificate: http://bit.ly/mkvU3K
If I stick my nose up to the SI2, I can see inclusions right underneath the girdle and maybe one under the table, but I can't see anything on the SI1. I have seen both of these stones in person, albeit only in the jewelry store, and both look GREAT to me (an admittedly untrained eye). I repeatedly asked the jeweler to do blind tests, and probably 4/5 times I chose Diamond #1 (the 1.51 ct SI2). I did blind tests on the jeweler, and she always picked Diamond #2 (the 1.40 ct SI1).
My gut is telling me to go with the 1.51, but I'm conflicted because it's an SI2 and if I really try, I can see some inclusions. The SI1 is definitely "eye clean" and has the H&A designation going for it, but it's more expensive and smaller.
Anyone here have a preference or can offer some momentum to push me off the fence?