- Joined
- Jul 23, 2012
- Messages
- 20,245
Horrible advice!
Better advice: :Learn more about diamonds so you can make better-informed buying decisions.
Thanks all, gutted but thanks!
In terms of cost, I paid just under £200 (budget for this was around 250), so it's probably "bottom of the barrel" (or lower!) compared to most the tings I've seen on here. It was intended for a xmas gift to my wife, as she collects rings, mostly "dress rings" with "pretty coloured stones".
The reason this style of ring was important and took me a long time to find, it was kind of intended as a back up engagement ring, as hers needs repairing. (well re-repairing as a the diamond had falled out, but the repair job done locally was pretty awful and my wife wants to have it fixed, but we dont know any other jeweller near by that we trust...)
It seems hard to find rings in her size with the 3 small diamonds set either side, but she does really love that style.
One thing I'm wondering now is if it would be worth replacing the center stone in it...
P.S. Thanks for the comments on the pictures, it took me a while to take one somewhat in focus![]()
Don't settle on something you don't love (or even like) cuz it'll sit unworn.
It looks very white anyway, some lower quality stones look dark or greyish.
How does it look to you? Do you love it?
I would suggest buying a diamond simulant ring. Based on your explanation, I see that you are mainly attracted of the ring price and the ring model. However, it's up to you if you would keep the ring or return it. If your wife don't hit hard the center diamond, if she wear the ring gently, I don't think that there is a danger of cracking the diamond.
You can ask the seller for discount, because this diamond is not eye clean!
spacechimp- in general, .20cts heart shapes are not recognizable as a heart- too small.
Guys, we're talking about a ring which was purchased for about $250.
It's got a .20ct center.
And two other diamonds, maybe .07ct each- and stones in the shank.
You can see from the pics, it's not a featherweight piece.
$250. The parts would cost close to that, with no diamonds.
The imperfections, oddly enough, give me more confidence that they are actually diamonds.
Not that anyone looking at pictures is in a position to make a definitive assessment.
Yes, if you love it SpaceChimp, enjoy it.
If the diamonds and gold are authentic, I honestly don't feel you got ripped off.
I'm not saying anyone is wrong to warn or knock it or whatever.
I just think that for $250- if the gold and diamonds are authentic- it might be a very good alternative for someone. Not everyone has thousands of bucks to spend.
Exactly. If it is pretty, there is nothing wrong with keeping it.
If it has to be diamond it’s hard to find much for your price but things are out there.
However, nice rings can be had for that price in gold and gemstones like amethyst or topaz.
It is very typical for the price paid.
Even buying from a drop shipper online is not going to move someone up much if at all in that price range.
Someone good at ebay shopping might get something a little better for the price, or maybe not.
Paying more money of course they could get something better.
Hi @SpaceChimp. May I suggest an alternative? IF your wife's ring needs repair and she'd rather a 3-stone not a solitare, why not focus on that? @BrimstoneTwo just had a ring made at Durrant's of London (15 Greville St, Hatton Garden, London EC1N 8SQ, 020 7242 288maybe that would be an option? You could get a quote to repair her ring (and have the diamond properly set) and also a new setting if she would prefer a three stone.
Exactly. If it is pretty, there is nothing wrong with keeping it.