Hahahah thank you ! It’s my first project so I don’t know exactly how tall these 6.5 mm will look like
Personally, I like my rings to be as low as possible as I will otherwise beat up my stones and settings. For my 5-stone that is graduated like your CAD, I had the center stone lowered to the point where the culet touches the shank above my finger.
Thank you for your very detailed response ! We are trying to create the same kind of 4 clover setting as I have my earrings here is the full CAD! Tell me what you think and what kind of adjustment you will do!Personally, I like my rings to be as low as possible as I will otherwise beat up my stones and settings. For my 5-stone that is graduated like your CAD, I had the center stone lowered to the point where the culet touches the shank above my finger.
Also, your CAD shows the stones set so the girdles are touching. So, your ring will look more like "wall of bling" from the top. Its personal taste. I like when the sidestones are stair-stepped (so lower than the center, like the Vivant below), but also tilted more like the CVB Inspired Design.
TheGemstoneProject, the Vivant
CVB Inspired Design, Maria
You can also vary the prongs to create more interest from the side using a trellis or x-prong where the prongs cross at the base
WF 3-stone.
Or even have the prongs tulip style. I like this style for smaller stones as it looks tippy with very large stones.
moissaniteco
And you can use those prongs to bring some pave if you like the look.
moissaniteco
Thank you rocky salamander!! I think it’s a great idea and point ! It does seem like something off ,how the prongs meet the shank ! More flowery side view will be nice ! Do you think the stone shows be lowered to 6-6.2 hight ?If it was me...and this is very much my taste.
1) I'd lower the center just a bit more.
2) I see my ring from the side all the time. Rarer from the top. So, the side-view is important to me. To me, I'd like more flow and organic design on the sides. Something to bring the curves of the cloer to the sides. If you prefer a clean aesthetic, I'd lean to more tulip-style prongs.
Maybe something more like the leaves on this setting. I would not add the milgrain to the leaves on the side, but can you see the pretty 2-leaves on the side stones? Maybe that would be a nice element to add.
Here is a leafy gallery on a very low-set stone. https://www.instagram.com/p/BahDLIoFqH-/?hl=en&taken-by=davidklassjewelry
This ring has more of a fleur de lis. https://www.instagram.com/p/BafOOyWlMUz/?hl=en&taken-by=davidklassjewelry
Trellis. https://www.instagram.com/p/BY6vP23AiRv/?hl=en&taken-by=davidklassjewelry
Rocky ! What do you think about something like that ?Personally, I like my rings to be as low as possible as I will otherwise beat up my stones and settings. For my 5-stone that is graduated like your CAD, I had the center stone lowered to the point where the culet touches the shank above my finger.
Also, your CAD shows the stones set so the girdles are touching. So, your ring will look more like "wall of bling" from the top. Its personal taste. I like when the sidestones are stair-stepped (so lower than the center, like the Vivant below), but also tilted more like the CVB Inspired Design.
TheGemstoneProject, the Vivant
CVB Inspired Design, Maria
You can also vary the prongs to create more interest from the side using a trellis or x-prong where the prongs cross at the base
WF 3-stone.
Or even have the prongs tulip style. I like this style for smaller stones as it looks tippy with very large stones.
moissaniteco
And you can use those prongs to bring some pave if you like the look.
moissaniteco
300x240.png)
