Basically the cutter/supplier can have h&a or anything they want inscribed on a diamond, they might feel that in their eyes this diamond shows what they consider to be excellent h&a, however if you have a look at the article I posted you will soon see that because a diamond might show h&a, it isn't necessarily up to the strict standards needed to be a true example of this cutting style - hence images are essential.
I've been following Takara for a while, but their story doesn't quite seem to line up.
Initially, BTD declared that they were one of the few HPHT grown diamonds (which is still on their website)
![]()
And now that an independent lab has certified that their stones are CVD grown, this claim has mostly fallen off of their website (although not entirely).
Most of their reports per the AV site can't be found currently on the IGI website.
I do appreciate the H&A designation, but I've seen no images that collaborate that statement and per prior Pricescope links,
Good evening everyone. yeah I had spoken to BTD about these and it appears there is a "default" Hearts & Arrows image on each of these reports. Forgive my skepticism but when I see default images I always suspect they're never all identical UNLESS they are/were using actual ray traced H&A images based on an actual scan of the diamond in question which I am able to easily do here in my lab coupled with real H&A images.
So... the diamonds you see posted there or more particularly on my site I will personally vette. If you check my latest video you'll get an idea of the type of analysis I'm going to be doing now on each of the diamonds that come across my eyes which include a heckuva lot more than H&A images. I also have the capability to inspect for strain and grain which I'll also be looking at. If you guys have any questions feel free to ask.
All the best,
Rhino
Thanks as always for your efforts, Rhino
I think this sort of situation highlights how the MMD market needs to develop to be more in line with the Mined market, in terms of greater transparency at the grower and supplier end (be they the same entity or separate), and through improved analysis and presentation of all (all!) relevant information.
Vendors such as yourself can create and add value by the excellent work you do on the latter of those thingsbut if you (and all of us) are being let down by substandard or even misleading information from the suppliers/growers, it creates unnecessary work and breeds distrust in the diamond industry in general, which has hardly been the paragon of trust in the past, what with opaque pricing and similar before the internet! lol
Thanks as always for your efforts, Rhino
I think this sort of situation highlights how the MMD market needs to develop to be more in line with the Mined market, in terms of greater transparency at the grower and supplier end (be they the same entity or separate), and through improved analysis and presentation of all (all!) relevant information.
Vendors such as yourself can create and add value by the excellent work you do on the latter of those thingsbut if you (and all of us) are being let down by substandard or even misleading information from the suppliers/growers, it creates unnecessary work and breeds distrust in the diamond industry in general, which has hardly been the paragon of trust in the past, what with opaque pricing and similar before the internet! lol