Dreamer_D
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Messages
- 27,332
lyra|1313895767|2995428 said:For myself, 3 cts. This is the post-PS answer. Previous to PS it was .75-1 ct.
lyra|1313895767|2995428 said:For myself, 3 cts. This is the post-PS answer. Previous to PS it was .75-1 ct.
Circe|1313896309|2995438 said:If I am told the carat size? 2.5 is my benchmark for an internal "Woah, baby." But since most people don't share quite that much info, it depends on finger size, shape of stone, and setting. I'll get the impression of "bigness" if the rock gives the impression of providing, say, 70% finger coverage.
Ditto!centralsquare|1313905581|2995498 said:3 carats. I'd think that anything over 2 cts is "wow" but anything over 3 would be like "omg that is humongous"
Circe|1313896309|2995438 said:If I am told the carat size? 2.5 is my benchmark for an internal "Woah, baby." But since most people don't share quite that much info, it depends on finger size, shape of stone, and setting. I'll get the impression of "bigness" if the rock gives the impression of providing, say, 70% finger coverage.
thing2of2|1313929266|2995564 said:Circe|1313896309|2995438 said:If I am told the carat size? 2.5 is my benchmark for an internal "Woah, baby." But since most people don't share quite that much info, it depends on finger size, shape of stone, and setting. I'll get the impression of "bigness" if the rock gives the impression of providing, say, 70% finger coverage.
Same here! Even on PS we don't see a ton of diamonds over 2.5 carats.
kelpie|1313929134|2995563 said: