A number of trades people have recently remarked about the limitations of using ASET in fancies, and that many PS consumers are inappropriately guided by incomplete or even incorrect perceptions of what can or cannot be learned from ASET's.
With PS consumers' best interests in mind, I'm digging up this thread as a basis for discussing what we can and cannot learn from ASETs when evaluating fancy cuts, and the appropriate use of ASET in rejection or selection. [URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/why-we-prefer-aset-to-ideal-scope-with-fancy-shapes.73949/']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/why-we-prefer-aset-to-ideal-scope-with-fancy-shapes.73949/[/URL]
From more recent discussions, I am beginning to think that fancies can only be chosen on the basis of what the consumer's eyes prefer (or a very experienced, trusted vendor) in real life.
My first, very basic, question is this: why would a consumer want to see an ASET?
With PS consumers' best interests in mind, I'm digging up this thread as a basis for discussing what we can and cannot learn from ASETs when evaluating fancy cuts, and the appropriate use of ASET in rejection or selection. [URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/why-we-prefer-aset-to-ideal-scope-with-fancy-shapes.73949/']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/why-we-prefer-aset-to-ideal-scope-with-fancy-shapes.73949/[/URL]
From more recent discussions, I am beginning to think that fancies can only be chosen on the basis of what the consumer's eyes prefer (or a very experienced, trusted vendor) in real life.
My first, very basic, question is this: why would a consumer want to see an ASET?