shape
carat
color
clarity
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. PriceScope Upgrade Completed
    For issues, questions and comments click the link below
    https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/pricescope-upgraded-comments-and-issues.229551/

    Dismiss Notice

Why we prefer ASET to Ideal-Scope with fancy shapes

Discussion in 'FAQ' started by JohnQuixote, Dec 7, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JohnQuixote
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    5,212
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    by JohnQuixote » Dec 7, 2007
    [ PS Admin - I was going to put this in FAQ but could not post in that forum. Please move it if appropriate - thanks! ]

    If you have ever wondered why experts ask for ASET photos with fancy shapes, here is why:

    Reflectors like Ideal-Scope and ASET were developed by diamond manufacturers and researchers in the quest to understand and improve diamond cut quality. They are a fantastic addition to any diamond pro's toolkit. They also form the backbone of the American Gem Society's light performance grade - and are used by cut-focused sellers to prove diamond performance to clients in the sight-unseen internet market.

    For those unfamiliar with these tools, here is a good primer: http://www.ideal-scope.com/using_howto.asp

    LIGHT RETURN: ROUNDS VS FANCY SHAPES

    Round brilliant diamonds are the most efficient at returning light. This means that, regardless of ideal-scope or ASET, rounds will show an abundance of red (or intense light return). In practical terms an ideal-scope image is as telling as ASET for rounds.

    But not with fancy shapes. The ASET gives information the ideal-scope does not; it breaks overall light return into less intense areas (green) and more intense areas (red).


    [​IMG]


    WHAT ASET REVEALS


    As you see, what's “all-red” in Ideal-scope is broken down into red and green in ASET... Green is not bad - it’s just less intense - but it's important to see this difference. Light return in fancy shapes is not as efficient as it is in rounds (again this is not bad, it’s just physics) so there will naturally be more green in fancies than rounds. Knowing this, we are definitely interested in what areas appear red vs what appears green, so the importance of the ASET image becomes obvious.


    EXAMPLE

    The two diamonds below are both attractive and they both appear all-red in ideal-scope. Princess 1 is an AGS 0 (Ideal cut grade) with an optimal balance of qualities. Princess 2 is very attractive - a far stronger performer than average commercial options - but you can see from the balance of red and green it is not at the same level of intensity as the AGS 0. There are two different levels of performance here, seen in ASET but not in Ideal-scope.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. JohnQuixote
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    5,212
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    by JohnQuixote » Dec 7, 2007
    GENERAL ASET INTERPRETATION

    Here is a great reference chart, with motion, on the ideal-scope/ASET site.

    Light return (red/green): In fancies we can expect more green than we’re accustomed to seeing in rounds. In fact, there is frequently as much green as red. A balance of red and green is desirable. In some fancy shapes it may be possible to have slightly more red than green, in others it may not be (see footnote*). Motion is more important to performance in fancy shapes than in rounds, and these red and green areas work together to create contrast when the diamond moves.

    Obstruction/Shadow (blue): We will see far less blue in fancies than in a round. This is logical since a round brilliant's spoke-like pattern of red (intense light) to blue (light from different, higher angles) drives the vivid on-off sparkle we associate with rounds. Fancy shapes do not have the same contrast in their sparkle, though the princess comes closest. Fancies rely more on movement than rounds for performance precisely because the contrast patterns are more subtle. Look for the balance of red/green to be partnered with areas of blue and small areas of leakage.

    Leakage (black): Leakage is black in a non-backlit ASET. The areas are, logically, smaller than they would be in a backlit reflector (where they appear white). In fancy shapes leakage can help create contrast but should be limited.




    *Footnote: Just as rounds are more efficient at returning light than the princess cut, other shapes can become less efficient. When shapes become less optimal they show more green than red. Logically, when developing their grading system, the AGSL set different thresholds for different shapes according to what is possible/optimal with the faceting style being considered. As ASET is used increasingly we will see more examples and know what better to expect with, for instance, a radiant or a marquise, compared to a princess or round.
     
  3. strmrdr
    Super_Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    23,295
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    by strmrdr » Dec 7, 2007
    Directly comparing IS and ASET images is troublesome due too the difference in head shadow built in, in my opinion.
    I''m not convinced that 30 degrees is optimal as my asscher work progresses.
    It is good for showing the potential for patterns but not as useful as I thought it would be when compared too the real world.
    The difference that the amount of head shadow makes is huge with them.
    Both IS and ASET can take someone down the wrong path if not carefully applied when it comes to step cuts.
     
  4. Gypsy
    Super_Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    40,198
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    by Gypsy » Dec 7, 2007
    So John/Storm... can you help me break down my Aset as teaching tool for step cuts? Mine has a LOT of green. Not a lot of red, some blue... and well, other colors going on there too.

    [​IMG]
     
  5. strmrdr
    Super_Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    23,295
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    by strmrdr » Dec 7, 2007
    for example a while back I was looking at a .52 ct EC cut the ASET showed perfect patterns but in a stone holder it quickly went dark at other distances and at 20-24" the steps blended.
    The stone was too small for the steps to separate at that distance.
    Closer and it went dark and further away it went dark in other areas.
    While I still find it useful it is not that final answer I was hoping it would be.
    Jon has also found some AGS5 light performance asschers that blow away AGS0 light performance asschers in the real world.
     
  6. strmrdr
    Super_Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    23,295
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    by strmrdr » Dec 7, 2007
    It looks like too me that the stone wasnt in the proper position in the scope.
    Areas that should be blue are red and orange.
    Stone positioning is absolutely critical with step cuts even a fraction of a mm can make a huge difference.
     
  7. JohnQuixote
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    5,212
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    by JohnQuixote » Dec 7, 2007
    It takes a lot of work. I'm constantly patting the guys in our photo dept on the back for evolving both of these tricky systems. We've got pretty good repeatability in terms of obstruction (though ASET has proved more tricky and sometimes acquiring focal depth means getting closer, means increasing degrees of obstruction). One of the hardest things about ASET photos is getting proper focus and good color resolution. Because of the multiple colors the lighting is much more tricky than Ideal-Scope, which is one of the most user-friendly tools we have.

    Also Strm, don't forget that diamond size can also confound setups. When you get near 8mm and over it can require a whole reset/rethinking of things, particularly making sure girdle alignment is proper as crown height gets unusualy large in face-down situations.

    Bear in mind also that this thread is intended as a FAQ/primer (read the first sentence), particularly for shapes like princess, not a treatise. The purpose of the thread is to demonstrate what ASET shows that IS does not.
     
  8. JohnQuixote
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    5,212
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    by JohnQuixote » Dec 7, 2007
    You win the prize Gypsy. Step cuts are more difficult than brilliants and mixed cuts in reflectors. That is not surprising, since their appeal is not necessarily in the intensity of light return, but more subtle qualities like pattern and fire.

    Rounds, ovals, princess cuts, etc. are far more readable - in both ideal-scope and ASET.

    The lighting in your photo was a bit strong which is causing colors to mix in some interesting ways.
     
  9. Gypsy
    Super_Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    40,198
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    by Gypsy » Dec 7, 2007
    Does this one help?

    [​IMG]
     
  10. JohnQuixote
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    5,212
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    by JohnQuixote » Dec 7, 2007
    It's more clear/consistent - and backlit (thus showing light areas I feel are exaggerated) - but this shape is one that really must be seen to make a decisive call. This has nothing to do with performance, but the patterns are wonderful. Beautiful cutting.

    Sorry Gypsy, I think I should have been more clear in my initial purpose - which is to delineate why we like ASET with the most common cuts (princess especially). Step cuts are a different world - as are cushions in my opinion - and while we feel confident in meaningful interp of round, princess, oval & radiants to a large degree in reflectors I would still prefer live eyes to IS or ASET for a step cut... The appealing qualities are entirely different than the intense performance we look for in modern brilliant/mixed cuts.
     
  11. FireGoddess
    Super_Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    12,145
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    by FireGoddess » Dec 7, 2007
    Great thread John! I thought this would be a good place to bring up a question I posed recently but nobody answered...what DOES a good pear ASET look like? Any pictures? I''ve never seen an example of a model pear ASET, which would be helpful since it is a fancy cut and they never perform stellarly on IS.
     
  12. chrono
    Super_Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    35,900
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    by chrono » Dec 7, 2007
    Good question FG. I''d like to see one for each shape (oval, EC, pear, marquise, princess, etc). Even a simulated picture is fine.
     
  13. Gypsy
    Super_Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    40,198
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    by Gypsy » Dec 7, 2007
    OK. Thanks John.

    So step cuts, as we all knew before... still REALLY REALLY need to be seen and chosen with the eyes. Fair enough! And I appreciate the clarification!

    I''m interested in FG''s question too!
     
  14. Rhino
    Ideal_Rock
    Trade

    Messages:
    6,058
    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2001
    by Rhino » Dec 8, 2007
    Hey John,

    The topic caught my attention. I really appreciate your attention to this especially for us fellow cut and techy geeks. While I would agree ASET information is great to have I''m finding that there are some stones with seemingly great reflector images be skankers especially in way of fancies. Something I''ve noted in the past and would maintain is that while reflectors are great for determining reflectors/non reflectors of the atmosphere surrounding the diamond, the red ones and even ASET does not always tell an accurate determination of head/body obstruction. I''ve recently had some diamonds (asscher) in my hands from 1ct to 2ct with ASET images that looked impressive (even scoring "0" on the PGS) but upon examination weren''t quite the best. There are also stones with great ASET images that are drop dead gorgeous too. As with all technologies I find none are the end all be alls. Sorry I can''t stick around here longer to participate but wondering if you''re finding the same thing. I have this thread bookmarked.

    Have a great season.

    Peace,
    Jon
     
  15. stebbo
    Shiny_Rock

    Messages:
    466
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    by stebbo » Dec 8, 2007
    Did you have the pic for this John?
     
  16. JohnQuixote
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    5,212
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    by JohnQuixote » Dec 10, 2007

    Thanks FG.Here are images of a first-class pear.


    In this case it was helpful to have IS and ASET because there is glare at the head, wing and point of the diamond in the ASET image.By looking at the backlit IS photo we could tell they were just artifacts of the ASET setup and better identify them.

    pear-example-is-aset2.jpg
     
  17. JohnQuixote
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    5,212
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    by JohnQuixote » Dec 10, 2007
    No problem Gypsy. [​IMG] Another thing which must be kept in mind: We are using one standardized system. That''s very important to understand - splitting hairs with these images isn''t possible source to source because right now there is no corss-platform uniformity... If we were to raise or lower the diamond it could change the angular spectrum and therefore some of the dividing lines between red/green by several degrees. We work very hard to align the girdle plane with the tip of the reflector (IS/ASET) which is one reason we perform our shots face-up and try to shoot same-sizes (if we have two dozen diamonds to shoot we group them according to size for consistent placement, and adjust as we do). There are versions of IS and ASET where the diamond rests face-down on a plate of glass and the camera shoots upward. Although this negates the tilt sometimes seen in face-up setups it also aligns the table of the diamond with the reflector, rather than the girdle plane, so that other adjustments (in fractions of mm) must be made if girdle-plane alignment is the goal.

    With all that said, if I had the choice (from any source) between an IS or ASET photo for fancy shapes I''d still take the ASET because it gives more information. And, given a known setup, I would prefer to have both if possible.
     
  18. JohnQuixote
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    5,212
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    by JohnQuixote » Dec 11, 2007
    We do. Shapes with brilliant pavilion faceting are much more predictable in ASET than step cuts. I''d say my level of confidence using IS/ASET in a known setup to make (for example) firm buying decisions would be round/princess for sure, followed by oval/radiant at a fairly high confidence level. Other shapes, particularly step cuts, I''d need to see in person. This is all hypothetical since we look at every stone we would offer to a consumer but I''m happy with the evolution we''ve seen.

    Since you mention it, we''ve also been experimenting with obstruction in step cuts. Garry gave us a heads-up when he saw some things going on that looked far too dark. Come to find that we were creating about 45 degrees of obstruction in some of those images. [​IMG] In general (maybe because we see so many more) our scanning & photography from A-Z with rounds & princess cuts is more standardized/seamless than other shapes.
     
  19. Garry H (Cut Nut)
    Super_Ideal_Rock
    Trade

    Messages:
    13,875
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2000
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page