StoopidMonkey
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2011
- Messages
- 127
I've seen a lot here lately about people getting dismayed when their platinum jewelry scratches or patinas with some wishing they had gone with white gold. Thing is, and correct me if I'm wrong, isn't white gold (or any 18K gold) just as prone to scratches as platinum is? If we're going by Vickers Hardness, here's what I'm seeing:
•18K Gold = 125 HV
•Pt900/Ir = 110HV
•Pt950/Ir = 80HV
•Pt950/Ru = 130HV
Apart from the notably less scratch resistant 950/Ir alloy, it seems the other common platinum alloys are in the same ballpark of hardness as white gold. Going by the numbers, the conclusion I come to is that all noble precious metals used in jewelry are susceptable to scratching, and the only way around it apart from frequent polishing is to opt for a less expensive "modern" metal such as tungsten carbide, which isn't seen in many lady's rings since they typically can't be cast, only machined (as in men's bands). Am I missing anything here?
•18K Gold = 125 HV
•Pt900/Ir = 110HV
•Pt950/Ir = 80HV
•Pt950/Ru = 130HV
Apart from the notably less scratch resistant 950/Ir alloy, it seems the other common platinum alloys are in the same ballpark of hardness as white gold. Going by the numbers, the conclusion I come to is that all noble precious metals used in jewelry are susceptable to scratching, and the only way around it apart from frequent polishing is to opt for a less expensive "modern" metal such as tungsten carbide, which isn't seen in many lady's rings since they typically can't be cast, only machined (as in men's bands). Am I missing anything here?