- Joined
- Feb 11, 2006
- Messages
- 3,212
Hi.
I have not changed my opinion, but I have yet to read the first ArtIcle thaT mOLLY POSTED. tHIS MORNIG I heard something interesting. The Supreme Court does not like to make very general decisions in cases, but would prefer more narrow limits. This person, a dead terrorist has no privacy rights any more--he's dead. So, the Gov't has the legal right to go after this one particular I-phone without the argument that privacy is paramount. They may have to narrow the scope.
Apple is a a secretive company and has held many secrets from outside eyes. Today, I am feeling that law enforcement gets a bum rap( not shooting black men) these days and I think for the most part, they have done a good job for our country. I want them to have all the tools they need. Abuse happens all the time ; IRS, cover-ups ect. medcaid, medicare. Privacy today is an illusion. You have all forfeited that right. Social Media has done you in. For a few photos, you sold yourselves.
Annette
I have not changed my opinion, but I have yet to read the first ArtIcle thaT mOLLY POSTED. tHIS MORNIG I heard something interesting. The Supreme Court does not like to make very general decisions in cases, but would prefer more narrow limits. This person, a dead terrorist has no privacy rights any more--he's dead. So, the Gov't has the legal right to go after this one particular I-phone without the argument that privacy is paramount. They may have to narrow the scope.
Apple is a a secretive company and has held many secrets from outside eyes. Today, I am feeling that law enforcement gets a bum rap( not shooting black men) these days and I think for the most part, they have done a good job for our country. I want them to have all the tools they need. Abuse happens all the time ; IRS, cover-ups ect. medcaid, medicare. Privacy today is an illusion. You have all forfeited that right. Social Media has done you in. For a few photos, you sold yourselves.
Annette