libramom
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2010
- Messages
- 220
Oh no! What a shame. I've looked on the site before. But I agree some of the cutting looks awful. I'm sure there are a few good stones though if you really look.Carol555|1336054062|3186543 said:Yikes,
I am new to this and I havent ever bought a gem stones before. So, I am being careful and checking everything I can before I decide who to give my money too.
Have you guys seen the reviews about Gemselect here:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/gemselect.aspx
I will NOT be buying from this company. Are AJS gems any good ?
thanks guys
Carol
Chrono|1336058538|3186608 said:AJS is on the recommended vendor list as being honest, trustworthy and easy to deal with. The only caution is that they no longer provide additional photography (but you can still ask as many questions as you feel necessary), return shipping is to Thailand (used to be able to return to a US address) and their gemstones are slightly less saturated than shown. So if interested in a particular shade or colour gem, browse for one a notch amped up.
I looked through the reports about gemselect. Some raise concerns about missing shipments. Some raise concerns about whether gemstones were synthetic or treated, and misrepresented to the consumer. Some reflect unrealistic expectations on the part of the consumer (e.g., the guy who ordered 15 gemstones for $550 and was surprised when his sapphires and rubies turned out to be what he paid for). Some are political. About half seem sufficiently similar that I suspect they were posted by the same person.Giordano v. Romeo said:The business practices of Xcentric, as presented by the evidence before this Court, are appalling. Xcentr ic appears to pride itself on having created a forum for defamation. No checks are in place to ensure that only reliable information is publicized. Xcentric retains no general counsel to determine whether its users are availing themselves of its services for the purpose of tortious or illegal conduct. Even when, as here, a user regrets what she has posted and takes every effort to retract it, Xcentric refuses to allow it. Moreover, Xcentric insists in its brief that its policy is never to remove a post. It will not entertain any scenario in which, despite the clear damage that a defamatory or illegal post would continue to cause so long as it remains on the website, Xcentric would remove an offending post.
However much as this Court may disapprove of business practices like those embraced by Xcentric, the law on this issue is clear. Xcentric enjoys complete immunity from any action brought against it as a result of the postings of third party users of its website.