shape
carat
color
clarity

Another... what do you think of this diamond????

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

Miss Aussie

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9
Hi all,

I have been lurking daily for the last 6 months learning everything I can and have made a couple of posts. I am in the market for a diamond for my engagement ring (something like the Whiteflash Fine Line) and am on a strict budget of around $5500 for the stone. I have been looking in the H SI2 (eyeclean) range with the best cut quality i can get in the 0.90-0.95ct range. My jeweller has got this stone in for me and I would like an opinion on the stone.. Please note I am in Australia and am keen to buy the stone locally.

Round Brilliant
0.90ct
F
SI2
Depth % 59.1
Table % 63.1
Crown Angle 34.2
Pavilion Angle 40.5
Measurement 6.21 X 6.3
Symmetry Good
Polish Very Good
HCA 2.1 - Very Good - Worth Buying if the price is right (VG for Light Return, Fire and Scintillation and Excellent for Spread) but outside GIA excellent and AGSO range
Cost $5700AUD

My question is should I wait and try and find a lower colour stone (G or H) with a better cut quality or is this a pretty good stone for its price?

Thank you in advance for your advice...
 
You can do soooooooo much better than this!

Look for tables between 54-57 (or even 58)

depth 60-62

crown angle 34-35

pav. angle 40.6- 41

girdle thin, medium, or slightly thick

At least very good or ex on polish and symmetry
 
Miss Aussie,

Are you happy with this stone? Why? Why not?

While I''m not an expert, if cut quality is of primary importance to you, as it is with most others here on PS, it is my suggestion that the perfect stone for you is still out there waiting for you to find it.

Since a great cut is the major determinant of overall light performance and only tends to enhance the color and, at times, possibly even mask the clarity, I would have to concur with you and agree that you might be inclined to wait and find a lower color stone with a better cut quality in order to be completely satisfied, regardless of whether or not this particular one is good for the price.

Good luck with your search. I hope you find a diamond you love and if this is the one ... congrats!
35.gif
Make sure to take pics to share with us.
35.gif
 
seems like there are ideal stones to be had online around 4000 USD.

imo, don''t settle when it comes to your ring.

this one doesn''t cut it.
 
Date: 2/6/2008 8:08:34 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
You can do soooooooo much better than this!

Look for tables between 54-57 (or even 58)

depth 60-62

crown angle 34-35

pav. angle 40.6- 41

girdle thin, medium, or slightly thick

At least very good or ex on polish and symmetry
I agree you can do much better! But if you have seen it and love it that is the main thing, but compare it to some tighter cut diamonds to be sure it is what you want, and also try to scrutinize at it away from the jewellery store lights if you can, to see how it will look. Also sometimes inclusions can jump out in some lights more than others, as this is an SI2 grade.

Just to add onto the good suggested numbers, especially at the steeper end of 35 crown angle / 41 pavillion angle, if you find a diamond of that combo, try to get an Idealscope image to further evaluate a diamond which may be bordering on the steep side. Also if you want a nice make of diamond and not necessarily a superideal, you can use the Holloway Cut Advisor for crown and pavillion angles just outside of these ranges which might work well together.

Whereabouts are you in Oz if you don't mind me asking?
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top