Another ASET this one ok?

[jewels2]

Thoughts on this one?

 

[Gypsy]

Nees The angles and table and depth.

 

[jewels2]

table 57

depth 61.4

crown angle 34.5

pav angle 40.8

 

[OoohShiny]

That gives HCA of 1.3, but it does look a little leaky to me?? And I'm not sure what's going on with the assymmetric black areas round the bottom of the pavilion?

 

[flyingpig]

I think the ASET/IS looks good, considering that the images are taken with a really bright white background.

 

[gm89uk]

It's miles ahead of your first stone. Much better

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

I think the ASET/IS looks good, considering that the images are taken with a really bright white background.

Correct. There is always some leakage in that zone, but in this case it might be less that 1% of the usual amount which is usually around 16% for a ray perpendicular to the table. Sometimes people get over worked up about this.

 

[OoohShiny]

I think the ASET/IS looks good, considering that the images are taken with a really bright white background.

Correct. There is always some leakage in that zone, but in this case it might be less that 1% of the usual amount which is usually around 16% for a ray perpendicular to the table. Sometimes people get over worked up about this.

Thanks for posting the graphic, Garry, that's really useful

Interesting that there s always some leakage, even in a perfectly cut stone!