AGS 000 but table is 59.5?

[Geebee625]

I am considering this diamond and am waiting for additional info from vendor. I know it's an AGS ideal 000 but the table percentage is large and I am not sure if this is a good thing or bad thing. Is this one of those 60/60 type diamonds? If so, how is the look of a 60/60 diamond different from a typical ideal cut. I'm a little confused. Thanks in advance for any insight on this.

 

[JulieN]

Looks good.

 

[John P]

I am considering this diamond and am waiting for additional info from vendor. I know it's an AGS ideal 000 but the table percentage is large and I am not sure if this is a good thing or bad thing. Is this one of those 60/60 type diamonds? If so, how is the look of a 60/60 diamond different from a typical ideal cut. I'm a little confused. Thanks in advance for any insight on this.

It's in the 60-60 class, but has a higher crown and less table-reflection than the 'typical' 60-60 that shows less fire than the Tolk/Ideal cut. In short, from the ASET, it looks pretty robust and likely has balanced performance.

 

[Geebee625]

Ok I got the additional pics. What does everyone think? Is it a keeper? The vendor says it's 100% naked eye clean.

 

[AprilBaby]

It looks like a beauty!