I need advise on a diamond (loose) that i came across at a jewelry store in the san francisco bay area
gia certified
emerald (almost square)
6.86 x 6.5 x 3.75
1.4 carat
color: d
clarity: v.v.s.2.
depth: 57.7%
table: 68%
girdle: medium to slighty thick
culet: none
polish: good
symmetry: good
fluorescence: none
comments: none
price $8300
below the comment section , there was a sticker with additional measurements
width 6.49 mm length: 6.86 l/w: 1.06
depth 3.7mm 57.0%
crown 35.3'' 9.4%
pavil 55.1'' 44.9%
table 4.42mm
culet 5.2%
girdle 2.7% (2.6-2.9)%
(i typed the above information exactly as it appears)
i''m really unclear what the '' means next to some of the numbers. i know i should be concerned with the depth and crown height percentage, but it appears that the crown angle , 35.3, and pavillion angle, 44.9, appear to be within reason. could i be reading the measurements wrong? all help would be appreciated in regards to if this is a reasonable price for the stone
thank you very much
unsure in walnut creek
mikey
gia certified
emerald (almost square)
6.86 x 6.5 x 3.75
1.4 carat
color: d
clarity: v.v.s.2.
depth: 57.7%
table: 68%
girdle: medium to slighty thick
culet: none
polish: good
symmetry: good
fluorescence: none
comments: none
price $8300
below the comment section , there was a sticker with additional measurements
width 6.49 mm length: 6.86 l/w: 1.06
depth 3.7mm 57.0%
crown 35.3'' 9.4%
pavil 55.1'' 44.9%
table 4.42mm
culet 5.2%
girdle 2.7% (2.6-2.9)%
(i typed the above information exactly as it appears)
i''m really unclear what the '' means next to some of the numbers. i know i should be concerned with the depth and crown height percentage, but it appears that the crown angle , 35.3, and pavillion angle, 44.9, appear to be within reason. could i be reading the measurements wrong? all help would be appreciated in regards to if this is a reasonable price for the stone
thank you very much
unsure in walnut creek
mikey