Hello everybody, I have been lurking on this site for over six months now, and it is finally time to take the plunge. I believe I have narrowed down the criteria I am looking for:
Color: G
(I have examined E, F, G, H and I asscher cut stones in several lighting conditions and have been able to see the difference in color up to G)
Clarity: VS1-VS2
Cut: Asscher
(There seems to be several different parameters that are important in the cut of an asscher stone. I am interested in specifying several of these)
· GIA certification
· L/W ratio: I am looking for is 1-1.1
· Polish: VG or better
· Symmetry: VG or better
· Depth: 65-71% (It appears that the proportions of the stone look better if the stone has a depth percentage that is larger than the table percentage)
· Table: 57-65%
· Cutlet: None
· Fluorescence: None to medium
· Girdle: Medium-Slightly Thick, preferably the girdle would be consistent around the entire stone
Carat:
I am not looking to specify the carat weight; I am more concerned with the final spread of the stone, since the spread of the stone is truly what defines the size of a stone when you look at the stone, not the weight. Obviously the light performance of the stone is just as important as the spread, a large diamond cute horribly would be unacceptable. I am looking for a spread of roughly 6.4mm-6.6mm, which seems to land me in the 1.5-1.7 carat weight using the parameters I specified above.
I have narrowed my search down to these diamonds that seem to fit the criteria I am looking for:
Cut Carat Depth Table
AS 1.54 G VS1 GIA 69.9 63 STK N VG VG N 6.38x6.37x4.46 1.00:1
AS 1.70 G VS2 GIA 70.4 64 STK-TK N VG VG N 6.47x6.45x4.54 1.00:1
AS 1.63 G VS2 GIA 65.7 62 M-STK N VG VG N 6.55x6.54x4.30 1.00:1
AS 1.51 G VS2 GIA 65.2 61 M-STK N EX EX N 6.55x6.55x4.27 1.00:1
Looking at other people’s decisions and images I am leaning towards the first or the second one. I am worried about the light performance, because obviously I want it to look good. Can you guys suggest which one has the best chance of looking good.
Thanks I appreciate your advice.