jasper11
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2006
- Messages
- 35
yes, and both ruby and sapphire are chemically aluminum oxide, with different contaminants making up different coloring.Date: 1/15/2007 7:37:34 PM
Author: belle
basically, yes, that is correct.
both ruby(red) and sapphire(all other colors) are corundum. that is, the red version of corundum is ruby and all of the other colors of corundum are sapphire.
oh its the dishwasher that destroys them?? haha no WONDER!! I gave up and got all stainless cause it goes in the DW just fine and I like that! oop sorry for the digression lolDate: 1/15/2007 9:28:00 PM
Author: ladykemma
yes, and both ruby and sapphire are chemically aluminum oxide, with different contaminants making up different coloring.Date: 1/15/2007 7:37:34 PM
Author: belle
basically, yes, that is correct.
both ruby(red) and sapphire(all other colors) are corundum. that is, the red version of corundum is ruby and all of the other colors of corundum are sapphire.
bit of trivia: when you cook on a calphalon hard anodized pan you are cooking on aluminum oxide, basically cooking on a ruby. that''s why these pans are indestructible-- as long as you don''t ruin them in the dishwasher.
Continuing the digression...Date: 1/16/2007 10:55:09 AM
Author: Cehrabehra
oh its the dishwasher that destroys them?? haha no WONDER!! I gave up and got all stainless cause it goes in the DW just fine and I like that! oop sorry for the digression lolDate: 1/15/2007 9:28:00 PM
Author: ladykemma
yes, and both ruby and sapphire are chemically aluminum oxide, with different contaminants making up different coloring.Date: 1/15/2007 7:37:34 PM
Author: belle
basically, yes, that is correct.
both ruby(red) and sapphire(all other colors) are corundum. that is, the red version of corundum is ruby and all of the other colors of corundum are sapphire.
bit of trivia: when you cook on a calphalon hard anodized pan you are cooking on aluminum oxide, basically cooking on a ruby. that''s why these pans are indestructible-- as long as you don''t ruin them in the dishwasher.
The radiant was introduced in 1977 (after the princess and barion cuts). It was designed to have the best qualities of both round/princess and emerald cut diamonds. It has the outer lines and cut corners of the emerald while enjoying the brilliant style of pavilion cutting. This causes it to be an emerald shape with more pin flash sparkle than the traditional step-cut emerald. The radiant's faceting style lends itself to entrapping body color more than the princess and round shapes. That is why some fancy colored stones are cut as radiants (and why experts may not be as quick to say a radiant can face-up more colorless than it’s lab grade like some other shapes). Of course this statement is not absolute; you can cut a radiant so that it doesn’t entrap color, but the style in general lends itself to doing this. Every diamond must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.Date: 1/15/2007 6:51:05 PM
Author:jasper11
I thought a princess was cut criss cut and that a radaint had different faceting...
Actually, John, the princess was introduced in the early 1980''s, after (and as a result of the success of) the radiant cut. In 1981, a group of Israeli diamond manufacturers lost a patent infringement lawsuit regarding the radiant and they were enjoined from manuacturing pirated radiant cuts. As a result, the princess cut was developed so that the Israeli industry could manufacture non-infringing squares while getting the best yield possible from sharp crystal rough. Because the princess was essentially developed "by committee," no patent covering it was ever applied for.Date: 1/17/2007 10:47:07 AM
Author: JohnQuixote
The radiant was introduced in 1977 (after the princess and barion cuts). ).Date: 1/15/2007 6:51:05 PM
Author:jasper11
I thought a princess was cut criss cut and that a radaint had different faceting...